1.1 本规程涵盖了使用便携式走道摩擦计获取走道表面摩擦测量值的实验室间研究报告和测试程序的创建。 1.2 本规程不涉及行人安全相关数据的解释。 1.3 本规程不涉及人行道表面是否适合特定应用。 1.4 该实践并没有直接解决参考材料和在用人行道材料的摩擦均匀性和稳定性这一重要问题。 1.5 符合本规程不会产生ASTM试验方法。 1.6 以国际单位制（公制）表示的数值应视为标准。 括号中的值仅供参考。 1.7 本标准并不旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.8 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 试验程序和实验室间研究报告的结果 协调员 遵守本规程旨在包括ASTM试验方法及其相关研究报告所需的所有信息；实验室间研究应按照实践进行 E691 ，也符合ASTM试验方法的要求。 3. 本规程内容未作为实际ASTM试验方法编制的原因如下。ASTM规定不允许（在标准中）引用“存在替代品”的专利或其他专有测试设备。 4. 虽然测试方法的研究报告中可能会提到专有仪器，但这将使测试方法无法成为包含测试所需所有信息的独立文件。 因此，独立的测试方法只能用于非专利仪器设计，该设计以物理特性和性能规范表示，足以使读者能够制作自己的“相同”设计副本。此外，为了达成一致批准并公布此类试验方法，有必要将该设计的ILS结果包括来自不同实体制造的设备的数据。然而，典型的人行道摩擦计设计（与其他类型的测试设备相比）非常复杂，因此对所有影响性能的物理特性进行完整的记录（足以让读者建立一个）可能是不切实际的。 欧洲标准EN 16165附录C和D说明了两个非专利摩擦计的物理和性能特征，该标准规范中没有记录这些特征。一般来说，每种不同的摩擦计设计在测试不同表面时都可能有优点和缺点，本规程为创建符合ASTM测试方法要求的摩擦计测试程序和实验室间研究报告提供了严格和标准化的结构，如果创建此类测试方法可行的话。众所周知 协调员的 符合此实践的声明应由用户进行评估，作为对的正式一致批准 协调员的 输出将不会发生。 5.2 如果一个 协调员 ，第节中的所有步骤 6. 应遵守。 5.3 这个 使用者 可以从根据本标准编制的ILS报告和测试程序中受益，因为可能有大约150种不同的元素（ 附件A1 )仪器和方法细节，重要的是要注意，指定这些信息的负担在于 协调员 ，而不是 使用者 。信息将提供给 使用者 如果他们想要的话。 5.4 在对特定参考材料的单个样本进行的ILS中获得的精度统计数据不会捕捉到同一参考材料的不同样本之间存在的摩擦变化。 ILS试验程序可能无法捕捉到该参考材料单个样品中存在的摩擦变化。ILS试验程序不会评估随时间重复使用的参考材料摩擦特性的稳定性。虽然不在本实践的范围内，但参考材料的均匀性和稳定性与ILS结果的解释和利用有关。有关这些主题的讨论，请参阅ISO指南35。 5.5 摩擦测量表示测试时表面的特性；使用后表面的可用摩擦力可能会发生显著变化。与参考材料一样，人造人行道表面一个样品的摩擦测量值可能不代表同一产品其他样品的摩擦。 5.6 获得测试结果是确定脚下表面的可用摩擦力是否足够的多部分过程的一部分。 附录X1 概述了F13.10小组委员会打算为实现这一目标而制定的一套标准。

1.1 This practice covers creation of interlaboratory study reports and test procedures for the use of portable walkway tribometers for obtaining walkway surface friction measurements. 1.2 This practice does not address the interpretation of data relative to pedestrian safety. 1.3 This practice does not address the suitability of a walkway surface for a particular application. 1.4 This practice does not directly address the important issue of the frictional homogeneity and stability of reference materials and in-use walkway materials. 1.5 Conformance to this practice does not result in an ASTM Test Method. 1.6 Values stated in SI (metric) units are to be regarded as the standard. Values in parentheses are for information only. 1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 The test procedures and interlaboratory study report that result from coordinator compliance with this Practice are intended to include all information required for an ASTM Test Method and its associated Research Report; the interlaboratory study is to be conducted in compliance with Practice E691 , also as required for an ASTM Test Method. 3 The reason that the content of this Practice is not prepared as an actual ASTM Test Method is as follows. ASTM regulations preclude reference (in a Standard) to patented or otherwise proprietary test apparatus where “alternatives exist”. 4 While a proprietary apparatus may be mentioned in the Test Method’s Research Report, this would prevent the Test Method from being a standalone document containing all information necessary for testing. As such, a standalone Test Method could only be for a non-proprietary apparatus design, with this design expressed in terms of physical characteristics and performance specifications sufficient to enable the reader to fabricate their own “identical” copy of the design. Further, to achieve consensus approval and publication of such a Test Method, it could be considered necessary that ILS results for this design include data from devices made by different entities. However, typical walkway tribometer designs (versus other types of test apparatus) are sufficiently complex that full documentation of all performance-affecting physical characteristics (sufficient that a reader could build one) may be impractical. European standard EN 16165 Annexes C and D illustrate what physical and performance characteristics are and are not documented in that standard’s specifications for two non-proprietary tribometers. In general, each different tribometer design may have advantages and disadvantages for testing different surfaces, and this Practice provides a rigorous and standardized structure for creating tribometer test procedures and interlaboratory study reports that would comply with the requirements for ASTM Test Methods, were it practical to create such test methods. It is recognized that a coordinator’s claim of compliance with this practice should be evaluated by the user, as formal consensus approval of the coordinator’s outputs will not have occurred. 5.2 If compliance with this practice is claimed by a coordinator , all steps in Section 6 shall have been followed. 5.3 The user can benefit from ILS reports and test procedures prepared in compliance with this standard, as there are potentially ~150 different elements (in Annex A1 ) of apparatus and methodological specifics, and it is important to note that the burden for specifying this information rests with the coordinator , not the user . The information will be there for the user if they want it. 5.4 Precision statistics obtained in an ILS conducted on a single sample of a particular reference material will not capture the frictional variability that exists between different samples of that same reference material. The ILS test procedure may not capture the frictional variability that exists within a single sample of that reference material. The ILS test procedure will not evaluate the stability of the frictional characteristics of a reference material with repeated use over time. While outside the scope of this practice, the homogeneity and stability of reference materials are relevant to the interpretation and utilization of ILS results. Refer to ISO Guide 35 for a discussion of these topics. 5.5 Friction measurements represent characteristics of a surface at the time of testing; the available friction of the surface after use may change significantly. As with reference materials, the measured friction of one sample of a manufactured walkway surface may not represent the friction of other samples of the same product. 5.6 Obtaining test results is one part of a multi-part process of determining whether the available friction of an underfoot surface is adequate. Appendix X1 outlines a set of standards the F13.10 subcommittee intends to develop towards this goal.