The concepts and principles associated
with Integrated Water Resources Management
(IWRM) have been around for many
decades. The IWRM approach of merging
water and wastewater utilities into a single
organization has several advantages, particularly
for larger urban areas. Not only can
pipes for both services be laid in the same
excavation, but human resources can also be
conserved through cross-training of water
supply and wastewater services personnel.
Although there are advantages, for a variety
of reasons the concept has been slow to
gain acceptance. Some of these reasons have
to do with the approach to utility services in
different countries; for example, in Germany
wastewater services fall under the purview of
the roads department.
Utility services in Finland, and to a lesser
extent Sweden, provide opportunities to
study the implementation of IWRM on a
wider scale. Certainly the mergers of water
and wastewater utilities in these two countries
have had their challenges. There has
sometimes been little cooperation, and
even a culture of rivalry between staff of
the merged utilities. But more significant,
there has been very little documentation
about how the processes of separate utilities
providing different services were actually
merged. This article looks at what is known
and what information is lacking about
these types of mergers and suggests areas
for additional study.
The authors suggest that the lessons
learned from the implementation of IWRM
in Finland and Sweden have wider global
applications as countries search for ways to
incorporate greater efficiencies while working
with increasingly limited resources.Includes 37 references, table, figure.