1.1 这些实践旨在评估保护性整体和整体元素，以根据其舒适性、适合性、功能和耐久性确定整体或整体组件在工作环境中的适用性。 1.1.1 选项A 是一种载人运动场景，旨在评估当佩戴在一系列不同的物理练习中时，合奏和合奏元素对佩戴者移动性的影响，旨在评估合奏或合奏元素允许的运动范围。 1.1.2 选项B 是一种载人工作任务场景，旨在确定整体或整体元素对佩戴者功能的影响。 1.1.3 记录用于完成这些任务的时间长度提供了一种方法，用于量化合奏或合奏元素对佩戴者功能的影响。 1.1.4 将受试者完全执行所有任务的能力联系起来，可以定性评估整体或整体元素对佩戴者功能的影响。 1.1.5 根据训练方案，对合奏或合奏元素的液体或蒸汽完整性进行可选评估，为评估佩戴对合奏或合奏元素完整性的影响提供了基础。 1.2 这些实践适用于保护套和某些套元件，用于防止不同的化学、生物、物理、热和其他危害，但主要适用于包括阻挡层（如液体飞溅）的套- 用于防护危险化学品或高度传染性疾病的防护套，或用于化学防护的蒸汽防护套。 1.3 以英寸-磅为单位的数值应视为标准值。括号中的值仅供参考。 1.4 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 第节给出了具体的安全预防措施 7. . 1.5 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 这些实践建立了标准程序，用于定性评估防护套装或套装元件在舒适性、适合性、功能和耐用性方面的性能特征。还提供了有限的定量测量。 5.2 这些实践适用于最终用户和制造商评估保护集成和集成元件的性能特征。 5.2.1 最终用户可以使用这些实践定性地确定防护套和套元素（手套、靴子和呼吸器）以及套组件（通信系统、冷却装置和内衣）满足其特定应用的程度。 5.2.2 保护性集成和集成元件的制造商可以使用这些实践来确定现有或拟议设计中的定性性能特征。 5.3 方案A允许 质量的 通过将保护装置进行有人训练，评估保护装置或装置元件的机动性。选项B允许a 质量的 保护整体或整体元件功能的评估。通过关联受试者的反应以及比较受试者和西装的尺寸和重量，可以使用每个程序来评估整体舒适度和合身度。 注1: 服装和人体尺寸数据的积累最终可能被制造商或最终用户用于标准中，以改进化学防护服的尺寸和防护服中整体组件的集成。 5.4 这些做法主要用于定性目的。一般来说，由于测试结果的主观性质，在一种类型的集成上使用这些实践的结果可能无法与不同集成上的其他测试结果进行比较。 5.5 这些实践的某些方面是定量的。穿戴合奏或合奏元素的效果也可以通过测量完成选项A和选项B中定义的练习和任务的时间来评估。此外，根据试验方法对液体飞溅保护装置进行液体渗透阻力试验 F1359/F1359M ，并根据测试方法对蒸汽保护装置进行压力测试 F1052 确定练习或任务是否影响保护装置或装置元件的耐久性，以提供可接受的完整性水平。根据整体配置，使用特定的评估和评估来确定整体或整体元素对佩戴者的视力、视野的影响，以及他们在连接到封装保护整体时将手移开并重新插入手套的能力。 5.6 实践中发现了确定防护服对佩戴者运动范围的具体影响的定量实践 F3031 . 5.7 虽然可以主观地评估套装的热舒适性，但这些做法并不是为了评估因穿着防护服而产生的热应力。使用实践 F2668 用于测量佩戴合奏或合奏元素对佩戴者的生理影响。 5.8 建议最终用户和保护集成和集成元件制造商将这些实践视为 最低限度 评估集合和集合元素性能特征的程序。在适当的情况下，还建议进行与其特定应用直接相关的其他测试和程序。 鼓励执行这些实践的每个设施建立自己的标准，以评估可接受的整体性能。

1.1 These practices are intended for evaluating protective ensembles and ensemble elements to determine the suitability of the ensemble or ensemble components in a work environment on the basis of its comfort, fit, function, and durability. 1.1.1 Option A is a manned exercise scenario intended to evaluate the impact of the ensembles and ensemble elements on wearer mobility when worn in a series of different physical exercises that are intended to evaluate the range of motion permitted by the ensemble or ensemble element. 1.1.2 Option B is a manned work task scenario intended to determine impact of the ensemble or ensemble element on wearer function. 1.1.3 Recording the length of time used to complete these tasks provides a means for quantifying the impact of the ensemble or ensemble element on the wearer function. 1.1.4 Relating the ability of the subject to completely perform all tasks provides a qualitative assessment for the impact of the ensemble or ensemble element on wearer function. 1.1.5 The optional evaluation of ensembles or ensemble elements for liquid or vapor integrity following the exercise protocols provides a basis for evaluating the impact of wearing on ensemble or ensemble element integrity. 1.2 These practices apply to protective ensembles and certain ensemble elements that are used for protection against different chemical, biological, physical, thermal, and other hazards, but are primarily useful for ensembles that include barrier layers such as liquid splash-protective ensembles used for protection against hazardous chemicals or highly infectious diseases, or vapor-protective ensembles used for chemical protection. 1.3 The values as stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values in parentheses are given for information only. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific safety precautions are given in Section 7 . 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 These practices establish standard procedures designed for qualitatively evaluating the performance characteristics of protective ensembles or ensemble elements in terms of comfort, fit, function, and durability. Limited quantitative measures are also provided. 5.2 These practices are suitable for both end users and manufacturers to evaluate performance characteristics of protective ensembles and ensemble elements. 5.2.1 End users may use these practices to qualitatively determine how well protective ensembles and ensemble elements (gloves, boots, and respirators) and ensemble components (communications systems, cooling devices, and undergarments) meet their particular application. 5.2.2 Manufacturers of protective ensembles and ensemble elements may use these practices to determine the qualitative performance characteristics in existing or proposed designs. 5.3 Option A permits a qualitative evaluation of protective ensemble or ensemble element mobility by subjecting the protective ensemble to a manned exercise routine. Option B permits a qualitative evaluation of protective ensemble or ensemble element function. Each procedure can be used to assess ensemble comfort and fit by relating test subject responses and by comparing the dimensions and weights of both the test subject and suit. Note 1: The accumulation of suit and human subject dimension data may eventually be used by manufacturers or end users in standards to improve the sizing of chemical-protective suits and the integration of ensemble components in protective ensembles. 5.4 The use of these practices is primarily for qualitative purposes only. In general, results from use of these practices on one type of ensemble may not be comparable to other test results on a different ensemble due to the subjective nature of test results. 5.5 Certain aspects of these practices are quantitative. The effect of wearing the ensemble or ensemble element can also be assessed by the measurement of the time to complete the exercise and tasks defined in Option A and Option B, respectively. Further, liquid penetration resistance testing is applied to liquid splash-protective ensembles in accordance with Test Method F1359/F1359M , and pressure testing is applied to vapor-protective ensembles in accordance with Test Method F1052 to determine if the exercises or tasks affect the durability of the protective ensemble or ensemble element to provide acceptable levels of integrity. Depending on the ensemble configuration, specific evaluations and assessments are used to determine the effect of the ensemble or ensemble element on the wearer’s visual acuity, their field of vision, and their ability to remove and reinsert their hands into gloves when attached to encapsulating protective ensembles. 5.6 Quantitative practices for determining the specific impact of the protective ensemble on the wearer’s range of motion are found in Practice F3031 . 5.7 These practices are not intended to assess heat stress resulting from wearing a protective ensemble, although thermal comfort of the suit ensemble may be subjectively evaluated. Use Practice F2668 for measuring the physiological impact of wearing ensembles or ensemble elements on wearers. 5.8 It is recommended that end users and manufacturers of protective ensembles and ensemble elements consider these practices to be minimum procedures for evaluating ensemble and ensemble element performance characteristics. Additional tests and procedures that relate directly to their particular application are also recommended where appropriate. Each facility performing these practices is encouraged to establish its own criteria for assessing acceptable ensemble performance.