1.1 本试验方法包括使用磨损试验机测定土工织物的耐磨性。此时，本试验方法仅针对土工织物而非土工膜、格栅等进行了评估。因此，本试验方法适用于土工织物，而非土工合成材料，因为所有产品可能不适合本磨损试验方法。如果以后的发展表明该试验方法的范围更广，则将进行适当的更改。 1.2 以国际单位制表示的数值应视为标准值。以英寸-磅为单位的数值仅供参考。 1.3 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.4 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 本试验方法可用于土工布商业装运的验收试验，但由于缺乏关于试验精度的信息，建议谨慎。按照中的指示进行比较测试 5.1.1 可能是可取的。 5.1.1 如果使用本试验方法时，由于报告的试验结果不同而引起争议，买方和供应商应进行比较试验，以确定其实验室之间是否存在统计偏差。建议为调查偏差提供称职的统计协助。至少，双方应从大量相关类型的材料中选取一组尽可能均匀的试样。 然后，应将试样以相同数量随机分配给每个实验室进行测试。两个实验室的平均结果应使用学生的 t -测试未配对数据和双方在测试开始前选择的可接受概率水平。如果发现偏差，必须找到并纠正其原因，或者买方和供应商必须同意根据已知偏差解释未来的测试结果。 5.2 耐磨性也受到试验条件的很大影响，例如磨料的性质、磨料在磨损试样面积上的可变作用、试样的张力、试样和磨料之间的压力以及试样中的尺寸变化。 5.3 在实验室的试验机上测量的土工织物材料的耐磨性通常只是影响材料实际使用中性能或耐久性的几个因素之一。虽然“耐磨性”和“耐久性”经常相关，但关系因不同的最终用途而不同，在根据特定磨损数据计算预测耐久性时，可能需要不同的因素。在各种材料的耐磨性差异较大的情况下，实验室测试可能是可靠的，可以作为相对最终使用性能的指示，但不应依赖于实验室测试来预测实际使用性能- 除非有数据表明实验室磨损试验与预期最终用途的实际使用寿命之间的特定关系，否则特定最终用途的使用寿命。 5.4 这些一般观察结果适用于所有类型的织物，包括机织物、非织造布和针织物。 5.5 如果在使用本测试方法进行验收测试时，由于买方和卖方报告的数值差异而产生分歧，统计偏差（如有），买方实验室和卖方实验室之间的比较应根据从被评估类型材料的一个取样单元中随机抽取的试样进行确定。

1.1 This test method covers the determination of resistance of geotextiles to abrasion using an abrasion tester. This test method at this point has only been evaluated for geotextiles—not geomembranes, grids, etc. Therefore, the test method is designated for geotextiles, not geosynthetics, as all products may not lend themselves to this test method for abrasion. If later developments indicate a wider scope for this test method, appropriate changes will be made. 1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in inch-pound units are provided as information only. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 This test method may be used for acceptance testing of commercial shipments of geotextiles, but caution is advised since information on the precision of the test is lacking. Comparative testing as directed in 5.1.1 may be advisable. 5.1.1 In case of a dispute arising from differences in reported test results when using this test method, the purchaser and the supplier should conduct comparative tests to determine if there is a statistical bias between their laboratories. Competent statistical assistance is recommended for the investigation of bias. At a minimum, the two parties should take a group of test specimens that are as homogeneous as possible and that are from a lot of material of the type in question. The test specimens should then be randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory for testing. The average results from the two laboratories should be compared using Student's t -test for unpaired data and an acceptable probability level chosen by the two parties before the testing is begun. If a bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected or the purchaser and the supplier must agree to interpret future test results in light of the known bias. 5.2 The resistance of abrasion is also greatly affected by the conditions of the tests, such as the nature of abradant, variable action of the abradant over the area of specimen abraded, the tension of the specimen, the pressure between the specimen and abradant, and the dimensional changes in the specimens. 5.3 The resistance of geotextile materials to abrasion as measured on a testing machine in the laboratory is generally only one of several factors contributing to performance or durability as experienced in the actual use of the material. While “abrasion resistance” and “durability” are frequently related, the relationship varies with different end uses and different factors may be necessary in any calculation of predicted durability from specific abrasion data. Laboratory tests may be reliable as an indication of relative end-use performance in cases where the difference in abrasion resistance of various materials is large, but they should not be relied upon for prediction of actual in-situation life in specific end uses unless there are data showing the specific relationship between laboratory abrasion tests and actual in-situation life in the intended end use. 5.4 These general observations apply to all types of fabrics, including woven, nonwoven, and knit fabrics. 5.5 If there is a disagreement arising from differences in values reported by the purchaser and the seller when using this test method for acceptance testing, the statistical bias, if any, between the laboratory of the purchaser and the laboratory of the seller should be determined with each comparison being based on testing specimens randomly drawn from one sampling unit of material of the type being evaluated.