1.1 本试验方法涵盖了一个实验室程序，用于使用销盘式装置测定滑动过程中材料的磨损和摩擦。材料在标称非研磨条件下成对进行测试。介绍了使用这种仪器测量磨损时实验注意的主要领域。 1.2 本试验方法标准使用了一组特定的试验参数（载荷、滑动速度、材料等），然后在实验室间研究（ILS）中使用，其结果如下( 表1和 2. )。（这符合ASTM表格的要求，即“执行测试的指示应包括仪器、试样、程序和计算的所有基本细节，以达到令人满意的精度和偏差。”）任何用户都应报告他们“遵守了ASTM的要求 G99 ，”这是真的。 1.3 现在在实践中经常发现，用户可以遵循这里给出的所有说明，但可以选择其他测试参数，如负载、速度、材料、环境等，从而获得不同的测试结果。鼓励使用本标准作为改进磨损测试方法的一种手段。然而，必须在任何报告中明确说明，尽管测试方法中的指示和协议 G99 （如果为真），测试参数的选择与测试方法不同 G99 值，因此测试结果也与测试方法不同 G99 后果这种使用应被描述为“遵循了ASTM的程序 G99 .”必须说明在这种情况下使用的所有测试参数。 1.4 以国际单位制表示的数值应视为标准。 本标准中不包括其他计量单位。 1.5 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.6 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ===意义和用途====== 5.1 通常，任何系统中的磨损量都取决于系统因素的数量，如施加的负载、机器特性、滑动速度、滑动距离、环境和材料特性。 任何磨损测试方法的价值都在于预测材料组合的相对等级。由于销盘试验方法并不试图复制使用中可能经历的所有条件（例如，润滑、负载、压力、接触几何形状、清除磨损碎片和存在腐蚀性环境），因此无法保证该试验能够预测给定材料在不同于试验条件下的磨损率。 5.2 此测试方法可分为两类:( 1. )测试将遵循标准的所有细节，并将结果与ILS数据进行比较( 表2 )，或( 2. )测试将遵循测试方法的程序/方法 G99 但应用于其他材料或使用其他参数，例如负载、速度、材料等。 ，或两者兼而有之。在后一种情况下，无法将结果与ILS数据进行比较( 表2 )。此外，必须明确说明选择了哪些测试参数/材料。

1.1 This test method covers a laboratory procedure for determining the wear of materials and friction during sliding using a pin-on-disk apparatus. Materials are tested in pairs under nominally non-abrasive conditions. The principal areas of experimental attention in using this type of apparatus to measure wear are described. 1.2 This test method standard uses a specific set of test parameters (load, sliding speed, materials, etc.) that were then used in an interlaboratory study (ILS), the results of which are given here ( Tables 1 and 2 ). (This satisfies the ASTM form in that “The directions for performing the test should include all of the essential details as to apparatus, test specimen, procedure, and calculations needed to achieve satisfactory precision and bias.”) Any user should report that they “followed the requirements of ASTM G99 ,” where that is true. 1.3 Now it is often found in practice that users may follow all instructions given here, but choose other test parameters, such as load, speed, materials, environment, etc., and thereby obtain different test results. Such a use of this standard is encouraged as a means to improve wear testing methodology. However, it must be clearly stated in any report that, while the directions and protocol in Test Method G99 were followed (if true), the choices of test parameters were different from Test Method G99 values, and the test results were therefore also different from the Test Method G99 results. This use should be described as having “followed the procedure of ASTM G99 .” All test parameters that were used in such case must be stated. 1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 The amount of wear in any system will, in general, depend upon the number of system factors such as the applied load, machine characteristics, sliding speed, sliding distance, the environment, and the material properties. The value of any wear test method lies in predicting the relative ranking of material combinations. Since the pin-on-disk test method does not attempt to duplicate all the conditions that may be experienced in service (for example, lubrication, load, pressure, contact geometry, removal of wear debris, and presence of corrosive environment), there is no insurance that the test will predict the wear rate of a given material under conditions differing from those in the test. 5.2 The use of this test method will fall in one of two categories: ( 1 ) the test(s) will follow all particulars of the standard, and the results will have been compared to the ILS data ( Table 2 ), or ( 2 ) the test(s) will have followed the procedures/methodology of Test Method G99 but applied to other materials or using other parameters such as load, speed, materials, etc., or both. In this latter case, the results cannot be compared to the ILS data ( Table 2 ). Further, it must be clearly stated what choices of test parameters/materials were chosen.