1.1 这些测试方法包括压敏胶带剥离附着力的测量。 1.1.1 测试方法A给出了以180°角剥离时，对标准钢板或单个涂层胶带的其他相关表面的粘附性测量。 1.1.2 测试方法B给出了对单涂层胶带背衬粘附性的测量。 1.1.3 测试方法C给出了双涂层胶带与标准钢板或其他相关表面粘附性的测量。 1.1.4 测试方法D给出了释放衬垫与单涂层或双涂层胶带粘合剂粘附性的测量。 1.1.5 测试方法E给出了胶带与标准钢板或其他相关表面粘附性的测量方法。 1.1.6 试验方法F给出了以90°角剥离时，单涂层胶带与标准钢板或其他相关表面粘附性的测量。 1.2 这些测试方法提供了一种评估给定类型压敏胶带粘附均匀性的方法。评估可以在一卷胶带内、卷之间或生产批次之间进行。 1.3 胶带背衬或粘合剂或两者的变化都会影响响应。因此，这些测试方法不能用于确定不均匀性的具体原因。 1.4 这些测试方法可能不适用于测试具有相对硬的衬垫、硬衬垫或在低力下表现出高拉伸的衬垫的胶带。 这些特性将导致测试响应的高可变性，而这并不是粘合剂真实性质的真实指示。 1.5 以国际单位制或英寸-磅单位表示的数值应单独视为标准值。每个系统中规定的值可能不是精确的等效值，因此，每个系统必须独立使用，不得以任何方式组合值。 1.6 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.7 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 这些测试方法是用于质量保证的工具。给定特定的压敏胶带和该胶带预期的最小或最大剥离值要求，测试数据可与验收标准结合使用。 5.2 与标准不锈钢板相比，测试方法A、B、C、E或F可以显示给定胶带与一个或多个表面（材料和纹理）的相对粘合强度。用有代表性的材料样品代替标准钢板就足够了。 5.3 试验方法A、B、C、E或F不能用于比较两种类型相同但制造不同的压敏胶带粘附表面的能力。 这是因为测量的剥离力没有针对固定的应力区域进行归一化。受力区域随背衬刚度和粘合剂流变性（硬度）而变化。两种不同的磁带在这些特性上很少一致。 5.4 测试方法D可以显示以指定的剥离速率移除覆盖胶带粘合侧的衬里所需的力。在其他剥离速率下，力将不同。 5.5 这些试验方法可能无法提供设计信息，因为剥离附着力与任何功能要求之间通常没有直接关系。

1.1 These test methods cover the measurement of the peel adhesion of pressure-sensitive tapes. 1.1.1 Test Method A gives a measure of the adherence, when peeled at 180° angle, to a standard steel panel or to other surface of interest for a single-coated tape. 1.1.2 Test Method B gives a measure of the adherence to the backing of a single-coated tape. 1.1.3 Test Method C gives a measure of the adherence of double-coated tape to a standard steel panel or other surface of interest. 1.1.4 Test Method D gives a measure of the adherence of the release liner to the adhesive of either single- or double-coated tape. 1.1.5 Test Method E gives a measure of the adherence of an adhesive transfer tape to a standard steel panel or other surface of interest. 1.1.6 Test Method F gives a measure of the adherence, when peeled at 90° angle, to a standard steel panel or other surface of interest for a single-coated tape. 1.2 These test methods provide a means of assessing the uniformity of the adhesion of a given type of pressure-sensitive adhesive tape. The assessment may be within a roll of tape, between rolls, or between production lots. 1.3 Variations in either the tape backing or the adhesive, or both, affect the response. Therefore, these test methods cannot be used to pinpoint the specific cause(s) of non-uniformity. 1.4 These test methods may not be appropriate to test tapes having relatively stiff backings, stiff liners, or backings showing high stretch at low forces. These characteristics will result in a high variability for the test response which is not a true indication of the real nature of the adhesive bond. 1.5 Values stated in either SI or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents, therefore, each system must be used independently without combining values in any way. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 These test methods are tools for quality assurance use. Given specific pressure-sensitive tape and a requirement in terms of the minimum or maximum peel value expected for this tape, the data from the test can be used in conjunction with acceptance criteria. 5.2 Test Method A, B, C, E, or F can show the relative bond strength of a given tape to one or more surfaces (material and texture) as compared to the standard stainless steel panel. Substitution of representative samples of materials in question for the standard steel panel would suffice to do this. 5.3 Test Methods A, B, C, E or F cannot be used to compare two pressure-sensitive tapes of the same type but of different manufacture for their ability to adhere to a surface. This is because the measured peel force is not normalized for a fixed area of stress. The area under stress varies with backing stiffness and adhesive rheology (firmness). Two different tapes seldom agree in these properties. 5.4 Test Method D can show the amount of force required to remove a liner that covers the adhesive side of a tape at a specified peel rate. The force will be different at other peel rates. 5.5 These test methods may not provide design information as there is usually no direct relationship between peel adhesion and any functional requirement.