本文介绍了吸附-膜过滤联合工艺与强化混凝工艺对水中天然有机物（NOM）的去除效果。作者描述了在不同水源条件下，如何在更大范围内研究使用单中空纤维膜进行试验的加热氧化铁颗粒超滤（HIOP-UF）工艺，并探索HIOP现场再生和再利用的可行性。这项研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段为水处理和HIOP再生建立了适当的操作条件，并对系统对三个自然水源的处理进行了评估。监测溶解有机碳（DOC）、紫外线吸收率和三卤甲烷形成电位（THMFP）的减少，以及维持恒定渗透通量所需的跨膜压差（作为膜污染的一种度量）。 第二阶段评估了该工艺处理13家公用事业公司不同质量水源的效果。据报道，通过强化混凝从大多数此类水源中去除DOC，为HIOP-UF工艺和更传统的DOC去除工艺提供了一个比较点。勘误表——本文中出现了一些错误:在图6中，“仅UF”和“HIOP-UF，环境pH”的符号在图例中颠倒；图9的标题应为“通过HIOP-UF工艺（100 mg/L Fe）去除不同pH值和SUVA 254的水中的DOC”包括13个参考文献、表格、图表。

This article describes the removal of natural organic matter (NOM) from water by a combined adsorption-membrane filtration process as compared with removal by enhanced coagulation. The authors describe how the heated iron oxide particle-ultrafiltration (HIOP-UF) process that had been tested using a single hollow-fiber membrane was investigated at a larger scale for different water sources, and the feasibility of on-site regeneration and reuse of the HIOPs was explored. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase established appropriate operating conditions for both water treatment and HIOP regeneration, and the system's treatment of three natural water sources was evaluated. Reduction in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), UV absorbance, and trihalomethane formation potential (THMFP) were monitored along with transmembrane pressure differential required to maintain a constant permeate flux (as a measure of membrane fouling). The second phase evaluated how well the process treated water sources of different quality from 13 utilities. DOC removal from most of these water sources by enhanced coagulation was reported, providing a point of comparison between the HIOP-UF process and more conventional DOC removal processes. Erratum -- A number of errors occurred in this article: in figure 6, the symbols for "UF only" and "HIOP-UF, ambient pH" were reversed in the legend; and, the caption for Figure 9 should have read "DOC removal by the HIOP-UF process (100 mg/L Fe) for waters of various pH and SUVA 254." Includes 13 references, tables, figures.