1.1 这些试验方法涵盖了用于评估拘留所和教养所滑动装置组件的正常操作性能和在攻击、烟雾和火灾条件下的性能特征的仪器、程序和验收条件。这些测试方法表明了设备在实际使用中的性能特征。未考虑安装和维护条件等变量。 1.2 这些测试方法的目的是帮助确保拘留滑动装置的性能达到或高于最低可接受水平，以控制未经授权或安全区域的通行，限制囚犯，延迟和挫败越狱企图，抵抗破坏行为。 然而，这些试验方法不涉及门结构。众所周知，为了满足这些试验方法的目的，门组件应符合试验方法要求的性能水平 F1450 . 1.3 以英寸-磅为单位的数值应视为标准值。括号中给出的值仅供参考。 1.4 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.5 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 4.1 拘留和管教行政官员的一个主要关切是其设施中使用的滑动装置的可靠运行。这些试验方法有助于为滑动门组件的装置指定物理安全性和性能水平。 4.2 这些测试方法评估滑动门组件对使用撞击装置、撬动装置、烟雾和火灾的攻击的抵抗力。这些测试方法还评估了滑动装置在模拟操作条件下的性能。这些测试方法不提供设备受到化学试剂、弹道、炸药或其他极端攻击方法攻击的电阻或性能测量。这些测试方法不测量设备在受到湿度、温度、雨、雪或风等环境因素影响时的电阻或性能- 携带灰尘或沙子。如果此类元件可能是一个因素，则应咨询制造商以确定正确应用。 4.3 这些测试方法的主要目的是估计拘留所和教养所中的滥用程度和设备的操作条件。这些测试方法的结果将为管教人员、公众和囚犯提供保护措施。 4.4 应根据制造商的建议提供预防性维护计划，以使滑动装置组件在整个预期使用寿命内按预期运行。 4.5 由于其设计变量和较低的用户要求，这些测试方法不测量本地或远程机械紧急释放机构的性能或循环寿命，或两者兼而有之。

1.1 These test methods cover the apparatus, procedures, and acceptance conditions for evaluating the normal operational performance and the performance characteristics under assault, smoke, and fire conditions of sliding device assemblies in detention and correctional institutions. These test methods give an indication of the performance characteristics of devices in actual service. Such variables as installation and maintenance conditions are not considered. 1.2 It is the intent of these test methods to help ensure that detention sliding devices perform at or above minimum acceptable levels to control passage to unauthorized or secure areas, to confine inmates and to delay and frustrate escape attempts and resist vandalism. However, these test methods do not address door construction. It is recognized that in order to meet the intent of these test methods, door assemblies shall be compatible with the level of performance required by Test Methods F1450 . 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 4.1 A major concern for detention and correctional administrative officials is the reliable operation of sliding devices used in their facilities. These test methods aid in assigning a level of physical security and performance to devices for sliding door assemblies. 4.2 These test methods evaluate the resistance of a sliding door assembly to attacks using battering devices, prying devices, smoke, and fire. These test methods also evaluate the performance of a sliding device under simulated operating conditions. These test methods do not provide a measure of the resistance or performance of the device subjected to attack by chemical agents, ballistics, explosives, or other extreme methods of attack. These test methods do not measure the resistance or performance of the device when subjected to environmental elements such as humidity, temperature, rain, snow, or wind-carried dust or sand. Where such elements may be a factor the manufacturer should be consulted for proper application. 4.3 The primary purpose of these test methods is to approximate the levels of abuse and operating conditions to which devices are subjected in detention and correctional institutions. The result of these test methods will provide a measure of assurance of protection to the correctional personnel, public, and inmates. 4.4 Preventative maintenance programs shall be provided in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation to enable sliding device assemblies to function as intended throughout the expected service life. 4.5 These test methods do not measure the performance or cycle life of the local or remote mechanical emergency release mechanism, or both, due to their design variables and low user requirements.