在实验室研究中评估了六种类型的使用点（POU）碳过滤器。这个 结果表明，所有六个POU碳过滤器的过滤效率降低了41%至98% 三卤甲烷（THMs）和卤乙酸（HAAs）减少41%至89%。四 过滤器（Brita、Culligan、eSpring和PUR）对三卤甲烷的去除率超过90%。 三个过滤器（Brita、eSpring和PUR）的去除效率为80%或更高 哈斯。 对于所有POU碳过滤器，THM的去除效率都高于其他过滤器 三氯乙酸的HAAs和去除效率高于三氯乙酸 二氯乙酸。这一趋势与三卤甲烷和三卤甲烷的等温线吸附数据平行 哈斯。这表明物理吸附是消毒的主要机制 使用这些POU碳过滤器去除副产品（DBP）。包括2个参考文献、表格和图表。

Six types of point-of-use (POU) carbon filters were evaluated in a laboratory study. The results indicated that all six POU carbon filters resulted in a 41 to 98% reduction in trihalomethanes (THMs) and a 41% to 89% reduction in haloacetic acids (HAAs). Four filters (Brita, Culligan, eSpring, and PUR) had removal efficiencies over 90% for THMs. Three filters (Brita, eSpring, and PUR) had removal efficiencies at 80% or higher for HAAs. For all POU carbon filters, removal efficiencies for THMs were higher than those for HAAs and removal efficiencies for trichloroacetic acid were higher than those for dichloroacetic acid. This trend is parallel to the isotherm adsorption data for THMs and HAAs. This indicates that physical adsorption is the main mechanism for disinfection byproduct (DBP) removal using these POU carbon filters. Includes 2 references, tables, figure.