在市政供水行业中，控制系统（有时称为 监控和数据采集（SCADA）系统）一直是 采用传统的设计-投标-建造方法作为主要项目 送货方式。例如，控制系统经常被捆绑到工厂中 建设或升级项目。控制系统已经变得如此完整 在这些项目中，业主、设计顾问、承包商和监管机构 所有人都了解这些系统的工作原理、客户和政治治理 所有机构都接受交付过程的结果。在过去几年里， 然而，越来越大的压力要求使用 现有的最佳技术促使公用事业提供商完成了许多工作 独立控制系统项目使用一系列非- 传统方法。 非传统方法包括从简单的投标人资格预审到评估 设计-建造（DB）建议书。本文讨论了控制系统交付 方法，因为它们与案例研究有关，并提供了对 提出了非传统项目交付方法的好处。包括2个参考文献、表格和图表。

In the municipal water industry, control systems (sometimes referred to as supervisory control and data acquisition [SCADA] systems) historically have been provided using a traditional design-bid-build approach as the predominant project delivery method. For instance, control systems are frequently bundled into plant construction or upgrade projects. Control systems have become so well integrated in these projects that owners, design consultants, contractors, and regulators all understand how these systems work, and customers and political governing bodies all accept the delivery process results. During the last several years, however, growing pressure to provide high-performance, competitive services using the best available technology has prompted utility providers to complete many stand-alone control system projects using an array of non-traditional methods. Non-traditional methods range from simple bidder prequalification to evaluated proposals to design-build (DB). This paper discusses control system delivery methods as they relate to case studies and provides a 'reality check' of the proposed benefits of non-traditional project delivery methods. Includes 2 references, tables, figures.