1.1本标准旨在作为指南。它列举了在为部件、装置或系统的最大允许气体泄漏制定最终规范时需要考虑的因素。本指南涉及并提供了编制泄漏测试规范的数据示例。它主要适用于指定卤素泄漏测试方法。 1.2描述了两种类型的规范: 1.2.1操作规范（OS），以及 1.2.2测试规范（TS）: 总计，以及 每次泄漏。 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全和健康实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 ====意义和用途====== 对于任何要测试的产品，几何复杂度将有很大差异。然而，无论几何形状如何，确定有效泄漏规格的基本概念对所有人来说都是一样的，无论是简单的、普通的还是复杂的。 写入操作系统所需的数据，即总泄漏量（摩尔）、时间和通过泄漏的压差，可以是可用的，也可以通过测试或测量来确定。 由于其他人使用该值或仅仅因为信誉原因而选择泄漏规格中使用的值的用户可能会发现该值不符合产品要求。 过于严格的规范可能会导致泄漏测试成本过高。限制不够严格的规范可能会导致产品过早失效，或增加保修成本，或两者兼而有之。 在本推荐指南中，将以制冷剂系统的复杂几何形状为例，使用确定泄漏规格的典型图示。值得指出的是，用户应该意识到，所选的值和测试方法不一定代表该应用的最佳或典型值。

1.1 This standard is intended as a guide. It enumerates factors to be considered in preparing a definitive specification for maximum permissible gas leakage of a component, device, or system. The guide relates and provides examples of data for the preparation of leak testing specifications. It is primarily applicable for use in specifying halogen leak testing methods. 1.2 Two types of specifications are described: 1.2.1 Operational specifications (OS), and 1.2.2 Testing specifications (TS): Total, and Each leak. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. ====== Significance And Use ====== For any product to be tested the geometrical complexity will vary widely. However, the basic concept of determining an operative leakage specification regardless of geometries is much the same for all, whether it be simple, ordinary, or complex. The data required for writing the OS, which is total leakage (moles), time(s), and pressure difference across the leak, are either available or can be determined by tests or measurements. A user who selects values to be used in a leakage specification as a result of someone else having used the value or simply because of prestige reasons, may find the value or values unsatisfactory for the product. A specification that is too restrictive may result in excessive leak testing costs. A specification that is not restrictive enough may result in premature product failure, or increased warranty costs, or both. A typical illustration for determining a leakage specification, using the complex geometry of a refrigerant system for an example, will be used throughout this recommended guide. It is well to point out that the user should realize that the values and test methods selected do not necessarily represent the best or typical ones for this application.