本幻灯片概述了一项处理味道和气味化合物的试点研究，以及消毒副产物形成的特征，其目标是:基于 每个订单的电能（EEO） 减少geosmin和2-MIB； 监测AOP对氯的影响 衰退和 监测消毒副产物（DBP） 氯化后形成。优化过氧化氢剂量的原因如下:H₂O₂施加氯需求； 去除H₂O₂:添加过量氯，以及 操作问题（正确的剂量）；和 最佳H₂O₂实际剂量 立场需要改变 尽可能低， 有效去除味道和气味，以及 尽量减少成本。第二个目标涉及: 验证AOP改变氯的假设 样品的衰减特性 更改名称； 测试初始水，单独紫外线光解，AOP 治疗（UV/H₂O₂） -1.5,2.5,4 mg/L氯； 在15分钟内监测游离氯残留， 1小时、24小时、48小时；和 氯气消耗量的增加可能会影响 DBP生产。DBP形成的第三个目标 涉及以下内容: 用0.2 mg/L的过氧化氢淬火 过氧化氢酶； 添加NaOCl以产生残余 24小时后1毫克/升（2.5毫克/升）； 模拟配电系统 （SDS）测试:15分钟、24小时和48小时；和 测量THM和HAA9。包括2个参考文献、表格和图表。

This slide presentation outlines a pilot study for treating taste and odor compounds and the characterization of disinfection byproduct formation that had the objectives of: optimizing peroxide dose based on Electrical-Energy-per-Order (EEO) for reduction of geosmin and 2-MIB; monitoring the effect of AOP on chlorine decay; and, monitor disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation following chlorination. The reasons for optimizing peroxide dose are outlined as follows: H₂O₂ exerts chlorine demand; removal of H₂O₂: addition of excess chlorine, and operational concerns (correct dosing); and, optimal H₂O₂ dose from practical standpoint needs to be as low as possible, effective taste and odor removal, and minimize costs. The second objective involved: testing hypothesis that AOP alters chlorine decay characteristics of a sample through altering NOM; testing initial water, UV photolysis alone, AOP treatment (UV/H₂O₂) - 1.5, 2.5, 4 mg/L chlorine; monitor free chlorine residual at 15 min, 1 hour, 24 hrs, 48 hrs; and, increasing chlorine consumption may impact DBP production. The third objective of DBP formation following chlorination involved: peroxide quenched with 0.2 mg/L catalase enzyme; NaOCl dosed to result in residual of 1 mg/L after 24 hrs (2.5 mg/L); simulated distribution system (SDS) testing: 15 min, 24 & 48 hrs; and, measure THM and HAA9. Includes 2 references, tables, figures.