1.1为了确保公众能够接受并及时恢复因自然或人为灾害（包括恐怖事件）而受到污染的资产，必须在社区一级制定并量身定制一项预先规划的战略，并由政府提供便利，该政府主张在危机期间支持受影响社区并让其参与。这一预先规划的恢复战略需要无缝地纳入社区内的整体应急管理过程。本指南为公众参与以利益相关者为中心的、基于共识的事件恢复过程提供了一个框架（即战略），适用于这种参与对于推动停滞（由于利益相关者问题）的恢复过程至关重要的情况。 该框架旨在成为一个特定于事件、特定于社区的过程，以帮助优先考虑和考虑必要的行动，以优化因灾难而受到污染的资产的恢复。 1.2本指南旨在描述一个高度灵活的恢复规划过程，因此没有为此活动指定或建议具体的行动方案。 1.3本指南旨在协助实施恢复规划过程，以便对与人类健康、生态、社会文化价值和经济影响相关的影响进行全面评估和平衡。它旨在与当前的联邦应急管理局（FEMA）指南和其他指南以及机构程序和要求保持一致，以解决特定的利益相关者问题和担忧。 1.4根据国家响应计划，通过建立联合现场办公室（JFO），完成需要联邦援助的灾害的即时响应和稳定阶段后，需要规划和启动缓解和恢复活动，以解决对受影响地区任何受污染资产的重大长期影响。本指南提供了一个流程，JFO可以使用该流程就这些资产的恢复达成利益相关者的共识。 1.5用户应参考其他与恢复相关的标准、法规和来源，以了解在使用恢复规划评估中可能需要的预测模型或其他分析工具时的具体方法。 1.6虽然恢复规划过程的实施旨在灾难发生后使用，但它需要成为社区的一个组成部分 ’ 并将其纳入适当的社区响应计划。在事件发生之前，通过社区资产映射等流程，识别社区的重要资产和与各资产相关的关键利益相关者，将有助于确保在灾难性事件中资产受到实际污染后，进行更有效的恢复。 1.7由于本指南中提出的恢复规划遵循事件发生前制定的计划，因此，重要的是协调资产恢复计划与事件预先规划，以尽量减少不确定、低概率但潜在成本高昂的自然和人为灾害对重要资产的损害。资产恢复所需的内容将在一定程度上取决于在极端事件发生之前采取了哪些措施来保护这些资产。 指导 E2506 提供了一个三步协议，用于制定和评估已建设施的风险缓解策略。在应用指南时确定用于风险缓解的资产 E2506 在灾难发生之前，使用本指南的恢复利益相关者可能希望在灾难发生后的恢复阶段考虑恢复的资产。 1.8 本标准指南并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准指南的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全和健康实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 ====意义和用途====== 理解和管理人类健康、生态条件、社会- 社区的文化价值观、经济福祉和高价值资产对于及时和可接受的恢复至关重要。本标准指南旨在帮助责任方识别和整合受影响的利益相关者，并建立一个流程，以识别和解决对满意恢复至关重要的关键问题。本标准指南以 “ 框架 ” 帮助确保所有恢复规划过程的组成部分（即人类健康、生态条件、社会文化价值和经济福利）都得到考虑。该框架旨在允许用户确定流程的哪些组件适用于正在解决的恢复问题，并建立每个组件所需的分析详细程度。 它提供了一般性指导，以帮助选择方法和方法，对每个主要的恢复规划组成部分（即人类健康、生态条件、社会文化价值和经济福利）进行具体分析。 通过积极让受影响的利益相关者参与恢复决策过程，它将帮助用户确定过程的方向，以确定优先顺序，并考虑那些 ’ 事件的后果和由此产生的恢复最直接地影响着人们的生活。这不仅大大增加了成功和可接受的修复的机会，还将有助于提高公众对责任方的信任 ’ 快速恢复高价值资产的能力。

1.1 To ensure a publicly acceptable and timely restoration of an asset contaminated as a result of a natural or man-made disaster, including a terrorist event, it is essential to have a pre-planned strategy developed and tailored at the community level and facilitated by the government which advocates the support and involvement of the affected community during such a crisis period. This pre-planned strategy for restoration will need to be seamlessly incorporated into the overall emergency management process within the community. This guide presents a framework (that is, strategy) for involving the public in a stakeholder-focused, consensus-based event restoration process, for those situations where such involvement is essential to move a stalled (due to stakeholder issues) restoration process forward. This framework is designed to be an event-specific, community-specific process to help prioritize and consider actions necessary to optimize the restoration of an asset contaminated as the result of a disaster. 1.2 This guide is intended to describe a highly flexible restoration planning process, and therefore does not specify or recommend a specific course of action for this activity. 1.3 This guide is intended to assist in the implementation of a restoration planning process allowing a holistic assessment and balancing of the impacts associated with human health, ecology, socio-cultural values, and economic implications. It is intended to be used in alignment with current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance and other guides and agency procedures and requirements to address specific stakeholder issues and concerns. 1.4 After completing the immediate response and stabilization phase of a disaster that required Federal assistance through establishment of a Joint Field Office (JFO) in accordance with the National Response Plan, mitigation and recovery activities will need to be planned and initiated to address the significant long-term impacts for any contaminated assets in the affected area. This guide provides a process that can be used by the JFO to gain stakeholder consensus on the restoration of these assets. 1.5 The user should consult other restoration-related standards, regulations, and sources for specific methods in the utilization of predictive models or other analysis tools that may be required under a restoration planning assessment. 1.6 Although the implementation of a restoration planning process is intended for use after a disaster occurs, it needs to be an integral part of a community ’ s pre-event planning activities and incorporated into appropriate community response plans. Identifying the important assets of a community and key stakeholders associated with each respective asset, before an event occurs through a process such as Community Asset Mapping, will help ensure a more efficient restoration process following an actual contamination of the asset in a disastrous event. 1.7 Since restoration planning as proposed in this guide follows a plan established prior to the event, it is important to coordinate asset restoration plans with event preplanning on how to minimize damages to significant assets from uncertain, low-probability, but potentially costly natural and man-made disasters. What will be required for asset restoration will be in part dependent on what measures have been taken to protect those same assets before the extreme event occurs. Guide E2506 provides a three-step protocol for formulating and evaluating risk mitigation strategies for constructed facilities. Assets identified for risk mitigation in the application of Guide E2506 prior to a disaster will likely be assets that the restoration stakeholders using this guide will want to consider restoring in the recovery phase following a disaster. 1.8 This standard guide does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard guide to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. ====== Significance And Use ====== The understanding and management of the interrelationship between human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values, and economic well-being of the community and the high-value asset is essential to timely and acceptable restoration. This standard guide is designed to help responsible party(ies) with the identification and integration of affected stakeholders and with the establishment of a process to identify and resolve key issues essential to a satisfactory restoration. The standard guide is presented herein as a “ framework ” to help ensure that all the restoration planning process components (that is, human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values and economic well-being) are considered. The framework is designed to allow a user to determine which components of the process are applicable to the restoration problem being addressed, and to establish the level of analytical detail necessary for each component. It provides general guidance to help with the selection of approaches and methods for specific analysis of each of the major restoration planning components (that is, human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values, and economic well-being). By actively involving affected stakeholders in the restoration decision-making process, it will help the user to orient the process to prioritize and consider the most important issues of those who ’ s lives are most directly impacted by the consequences of the event and resulting restoration. This not only greatly increases the chances of a successful and acceptable restoration, but will also help promote public trust in the responsible party ’ s ability to rapidly restore the high-value asset(s).