1.1 该测试方法适用于在复杂、非结构化且通常危险的环境中操作的远程操作地面机器人。它规定了测量机器人在不同高度、深度、方向和限制条件下灵巧地检查环境中感兴趣物体的能力所需的设备、程序和性能指标。此测试方法是几个相关的方法之一 灵巧 可用于评估整个系统能力的测试。 1.2 机器人系统通常包括控制所有功能的远程操作员，因此通常需要车载摄像机和远程操作员显示器。 辅助特征或自主行为可以提高整个系统的有效性或效率。 1.3 不同的用户社区可以在这种测试方法中为各种任务需求设置自己的可接受性能阈值。 1.4 执行位置-- 该测试方法可以在任何可以实现指定设备和环境条件的地方执行。 1.5 单位-- 本试验方法采用国际单位制（SI单位）和美国习惯单位（英制单位）。它们不是数学转换。相反，它们在每个单位系统中都是近似的等价物，以便能够在不同的国家使用现成的材料。 为了比较试验方法的结果，每个单位系统中规定尺寸之间的差异是微不足道的，因此每个单位系统在本试验方法中被单独视为标准。 1.6 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.7 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ===意义和用途====== 5.1 该测试方法是一整套相关测试方法的一部分，这些测试方法提供了对人类系统交互能力的可重复测量，包括机器人系统的机动性、灵活性、检查、远程操作员熟练程度和态势感知。特别地，操作员控制单元（OCU）的设计和接口特征可能影响操作员用机器人执行移动和检查任务的能力。 5.2 该测试装置成本低且易于制造，因此可以广泛复制。程序也很简单。这简化了不同测试地点、日期和时间之间的比较，以确定最佳- 类内系统和运算符。 5.3 评估-- 该测试方法可在受控环境中用于测量基线能力。它还可以嵌入到作战训练场景中，以测量由于照明、天气、无线电通信、GPS精度等不受控制的变量而导致的退化。 5.4 采购-- 该测试方法可用于识别系统中固有的能力权衡，做出明智的采购决策，并在验收测试期间验证性能。这使需求规范和用户期望与现有的能力限制保持一致。 5.5 培训-- 该测试方法可用于集中操作员培训，作为可重复的练习任务或作为培训场景中的嵌入式任务。 由此产生的远程操作员熟练程度测量可以跟踪一段时间内易腐烂的技能，并比较各小队、地区或全国平均水平的表现。 5.6 创新-- 该测试方法可用于激发技术创新，展示突破能力，并衡量系统在整个任务序列中执行特定任务的可靠性。将多种测试方法组合或排序可以指导制造商实现执行基本任务所需的能力组合。

1.1 This test method is intended for remotely operated ground robots operating in complex, unstructured, and often hazardous environments. It specifies the apparatuses, procedures, and performance metrics necessary to measure the capability of a robot to dexterously inspect objects of interest in the environment at various heights, depths, orientations, and confinement. This test method is one of several related dexterity tests that can be used to evaluate overall system capabilities. 1.2 The robotic system typically includes a remote operator in control of all functionality, so an onboard camera and remote operator display are typically required. Assistive features or autonomous behaviors may improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the overall system. 1.3 Different user communities can set their own thresholds of acceptable performance within this test method for various mission requirements. 1.4 Performing Location— This test method may be performed anywhere the specified apparatuses and environmental conditions can be implemented. 1.5 Units— The International System of Units (SI Units) and U.S. Customary Units (Imperial Units) are used throughout this test method. They are not mathematical conversions. Rather, they are approximate equivalents in each system of units to enable use of readily available materials in different countries. The differences between the stated dimensions in each system of units are insignificant for the purposes of comparing test method results, so each system of units is separately considered standard within this test method. 1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 This test method is part of an overall suite of related test methods that provide repeatable measures of human-system interaction capability including robotic system mobility, dexterity, inspection, remote operator proficiency, and situational awareness. In particular, the operator control unit (OCU) design and interface features may impact the operator’s ability to perform movement and inspection tasks with the robot. 5.2 The test apparatuses are low cost and easy to fabricate so they can be widely replicated. The procedure is also simple to conduct. This eases comparisons across various testing locations, dates, and times to determine best-in-class systems and operators. 5.3 Evaluation— This test method can be used in a controlled environment to measure baseline capabilities. It can also be embedded into operational training scenarios to measure degradation due to uncontrolled variables in lighting, weather, radio communications, GPS accuracy, etc. 5.4 Procurement— This test method can be used to identify inherent capability trade-offs in systems, make informed purchasing decisions, and verify performance during acceptance testing. This aligns requirement specifications and user expectations with existing capability limits. 5.5 Training— This test method can be used to focus operator training, as a repeatable practice task or as an embedded task within training scenarios. The resulting measures of remote operator proficiency enable tracking of perishable skills over time, along with comparisons of performance across squads, regions, or national averages. 5.6 Innovation— This test method can be used to inspire technical innovation, demonstrate break-through capabilities, and measure the reliability of systems performing specific tasks within an overall mission sequence. Combining or sequencing multiple test methods can guide manufacturers toward implementing the combinations of capabilities necessary to perform essential mission tasks.