首页 馆藏资源 舆情信息 标准服务 科研活动 关于我们
现行 AWWA MTC53717
到馆提醒
收藏跟踪
购买正版
Comparing Laser Turbidimetry With Conventional Methods for Monitoring MF and UF Membrane Integrity 激光浊度法与常规方法监测MF和UF膜完整性的比较
发布日期: 2001-05-01
作为CH2M HILL为科罗拉多州威斯敏斯特市进行的膜试验评估的一部分,对Memcor CMF-S、Pall Microza和Zenonzeewed进行了完整性测试。完整性测试的目的是评估常规方法检测膜纤维破裂的能力。除了传统的浊度监测方法外,还可以尝试一种新的浊度监测方法。用于监测领航员生产的渗透水状况的仪器包括IBR在线颗粒计数器、传统Hach 1720C浊度计,以及三台正在现场测试的实验浊度计。这三个实验城市流量计(指定为A、B和C)的灵敏度分别比传统的Hach 1720C高约100倍、800倍和700倍。包括表格、数字。
As part of a membrane pilot evaluation conducted by CH2M HILL for the City ofWestminster, Colorado, integrity testing was performed for Memcor CMF-S, Pall Microza, and ZenonZeeWeed. The purpose of integrity testing was to assess the capability of conventionalmethods in detecting a breach in a membrane fiber. In addition, the experiments allowedfor the comparison of a relatively new monitoring method (laser turbidimetry) to theconventional integrity monitoring methods.The instrumentation used to monitor the condition of permeate water produced by thepilots included IBR online particle counters, conventional Hach 1720C turbidimeters, as wellas three experimental turbidimeters which were being field tested. The three experimentalturbidimeters (designated as A, B, and C) were approximately 100X, 800X, and 7000X moresensitive than the conventional Hach 1720C. Includes tables, figures.
分类信息
发布单位或类别: 美国-美国给水工程协会
关联关系
研制信息
相似标准/计划/法规