第1部分:高应变率加载压力容器的设计:动态压力和失效标准:安全壳内的爆轰诱导动态压力加载用于容纳高爆炸效应的容器设计有多种形状、尺寸和材料。洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室30多年来一直使用球形压力容器进行高爆轰试验。军方的爆炸物拆除（EOD）社区使用压力容器来销毁陈旧的常规和化学弹药。本报告讨论了与瞬态压力和静态压力之间的差异及其对这些容器结构响应的影响相关的问题。 这些问题通过参考用于盛装烈性炸药（HE）的球形安全壳示例来说明，但这些概念通常适用于任何形状或结构的安全壳。在过去，这些安全壳的设计通常是通过保持容器内固有的弹性应变能平衡容器内由爆炸脉冲载荷产生的动能来完成的。在过去的十年里，已经利用复杂和先进的计算机代码完成了设计，这些代码处理了爆炸流体动力学和容器的高度非线性结构响应。 尽管过去取得了一些成就，但还没有制定任何行业设计标准或指南来解决压力容器爆震脉冲加载的完整合理设计理念。然而，本文件为与HE爆炸相关的非线性动态载荷、由此产生的非线性和高度复杂的容器响应以及与残余准静态超压相关的静态载荷提供了基础。了解爆炸条件下的动态事件是制定合理的压力容器设计标准的第一步。 最终，我们希望美国机械工程师学会（ASME）锅炉和压力容器规范将采用容器设计标准进行HE引爆。随后将发布一份WRC公告，内容涉及爆炸诱导压力荷载下安全壳安全设计的一般主题，涵盖一般主题的断裂安全和疲劳设计方面。第2部分:高应变率载荷压力容器的设计:安全壳内爆轰诱导压力载荷的延性失效准则过去30年，洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室（LANL），由美国。 美国能源部（DOE）一直在利用大型球形钢制压力容器进行高爆炸试验。这些球形容器的设计最初是通过保持容器内固有的弹性应变能平衡容器内由爆炸脉冲载荷产生的动能来完成的。在过去的十年里，已经利用复杂和先进的计算机代码完成了设计，这些代码处理了爆炸流体动力学和容器的非线性结构响应。这些船只主要是为单人船设计的- 使用应用程序。塑性失效方法建立在塑性拉伸失稳应变极限和塑性撕裂萌生作为失效基本参数的基础上。尽管过去取得了一些成就，但尚未制定任何行业设计标准（如ASME锅炉及压力容器规范）或类似指南，以解决爆震脉冲加载的完整、合理的设计理念和方法。英国奥尔德马斯顿原子武器研究所（AWE）已经为多用途压力容器制定了一个成功的设计标准。AWE方法使用ASME规范第八节第3部分规则，该规则主要针对多个- 使用应用程序。本文介绍了单用途和多用途的延性失效设计方法。随后将发布一份WRC公告，内容涉及爆炸诱导压力荷载下安全壳安全设计的一般主题，涵盖一般主题的断裂安全和疲劳设计方面。

Part 1: Design Of Pressure Vessels For High Strain Rate Loading: Dynamic Pressure And Failure Criteria: Detonation-Induced Dynamic Pressure Loading in Containment VesselsVessels used to contain the effects of high explosions are designed in a wide variety of shapes, sizes and materials. Los Alamos National Laboratory has used spherical pressure vessels to conduct high-explosive detonation experiments for over 30 years. The military's explosives ordnance demolition (EOD) community uses pressure vessels to destroy aged conventional and chemical munitions. Issues associated with the differences between transient and static pressures and their influences on the structural response of these vessels are addressed in this report. These issues are illustrated by reference to an example spherical containment vessel for containing high explosives (HE), but the concepts are generally applicable to containment vessels of any shape or construction. In the past, design of these containment vessels was typically accomplished by maintaining that the vessel's kinetic energy, developed from the detonation impulse loading, be equilibrated by the elastic strain energy inherent in the vessel. Within the last decade, designs have been accomplished utilizing sophisticated and advanced computer codes that address both the detonation hydrodynamics and the vessel's highly nonlinear structural responses. Notwithstanding the past accomplishments, no industry design standard(s) or guidelines have ever been developed to address a complete and rational design philosophy for detonation impulse loading of a pressure vessel. Nevertheless, this document provides the basis for the nonlinear dynamic loading associated with HE detonations, the resulting nonlinear and highly complex vessel response, and the static loading associated with the residual quasi-static overpressure. Understanding the dynamic events under detonation conditions is the first step towards the development of rational pressure vessel design criteria. Ultimately, it is hoped that the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code will adopt a vessel design standard for HE detonations.A subsequent WRC Bulletin will be issued on the general topic of safe design of containment vessels subjected to detonation-induced pressure loading covers the fracture-safe and fatigue design aspects of the general topic.Part 2: Design Of Pressure Vessels For High Strain Rate Loading: Ductile Failure Criteria for Detonation-Induced Pressure Loading in Containment VesselsOver the past 30 years, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), has been conducting contained high explosion experiments utilizing large, spherical, steel pressure vessels. Design of these spherical vessels was originally accomplished by maintaining that the vessel's kinetic energy, developed from the detonation impulse loading, be equilibrated by the elastic strain energy inherent in the vessel. Within the last decade, designs have been accomplished utilizing sophisticated and advanced computer codes that address both the detonation hydrodynamics and the vessel's nonlinear structural response. These vessels have been primarily designed for single-use application. The ductile failure methodology is founded upon the plastic tensile instability strain limit and ductile tearing initiation as the fundamental parameters for failure. Notwithstanding the past accomplishments, no industry design standards (such as the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code) or similar guidelines have ever been developed to address a complete and rational design philosophy and methodology for detonation impulse loading. Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) at Aldermaston in the United Kingdom has developed a successful design criterion for multiple-use pressure vessels. The AWE methodology uses the ASME Code, Section VIII, Division 3 rules, which is primarily developed for multiple-use application. Ductile failure design methodologies for both single-use and multiple-use applications are presented herein.A subsequent WRC Bulletin will be issued on the general topic of safe design of containment vessels subjected to detonation-induced pressure loading covers the fracture-safe and fatigue design aspects of the general topic.