比较和对比热舒适实验室研究中使用的方法，这些方法侧重于空气运动的影响。比较了三大类方法——受试者可以控制1）空气速度、2）空气温度或3）两者均不受控制的实验。讨论可能会混淆结果的具体实验实践。介绍了获取可靠数据的一些指导原则。得出的结论是，综合来看，本文中回顾的研究并不能为在ASHRAE 55模型之后制定特定的空中运动标准提供有力支持- 81.关键词:热舒适性、空气流动、实验室测试、实验室、美国、标准。引文:研讨会，ASHRAE交易，第97卷，Pt。1991年，纽约

Compares and contrasts methods used in laboratory studies of thermal comfort that focus on the effect of air movement. Compares three broad methodological categories - experiments in which subjects have control of 1) air velocity, or 2) air temperature or 3) neither. Discusses specific experimental practices that may confound results. Presents some guidelines for obtaining reliable data. Concludes that, taken collectively, the studies reviewed in the paper do not provide strong support for developing a specific air movement standard after the model of ASHRAE 55-81.KEYWORDS: Thermal comfort, air movement, laboratory testing, laboratories, USA, standardS.