本幻灯片概述了佛罗里达州三家公用事业公司在获得低压反渗透设施的项目交付方法方面的比较。公用设施包括:奥蒙德海滩市、圣奥古斯丁市和圣约翰县。演示主题包括:按实用程序描述项目； 项目交付方法说明； 项目交付方法的感知优势；和 项目交付方法的缺陷。结论是: 任何项目交付方法都会很好地工作，如果 参与者愿意；风险施工经理 （CMAR）和工程师采购施工管理（EPCM）可以极大地控制成本 以及时间表； EPCM提供最完整的团队； CMAR可能会与设计师发生冲突，如果较少的话 完整的计划/规范用于GMP；和 对于“保守的业主”，传统的 设计-投标-建造是最安全的选择。

This slide presentation outlines a comparison of three utilities in Florida in their project delivery methods for obtaining a low-pressure reverse osmosis facility. The utilities included: City of Ormond Beach, City of St. Augustine, and St. Johns County. Presentation topics include: description of projects by utility; descriptions of project delivery methods; perceived advantages of project delivery method; and, perceived disadvantages of project delivery method. Conclusions were that: any project delivery method will work well if participants are willing; Construction-Manager-at-Risk (CMAR) and Engineer-Procurement-Construction Management (EPCM) allow great control of costs and schedules; EPCM provides the most integrated team; CMAR can have conflict with designer if less that complete Plans/Specs are used for GMP; and, for "conservative owners", traditional design-bid-build is the safest option.