本powerpoint演示文稿首先介绍 比较四种吸附剂的性能 使用三种不同的方法去除天然有机物（NOM）并减少膜污染的能力 吸附剂加药方法。四种吸附剂包括:明矾、FeCl_{3、PAC和HAOPs。三种不同的吸附剂投加方法包括:预吸附、直接过滤和预沉积。演示结论表明:许多吸附剂去除NOM，但减少膜污染的能力取决于吸附剂的特性和加药方法；在低剂量下，HAOPs比传统吸附剂/凝固剂更有效地去除NOM（尤其是高SUVA NOM）；对于给定剂量的PAC或HAOPs，如果吸附剂沉积在膜表面上，比过滤前去除污染更少；吸附剂预沉积比吸附和直接过滤更有效地减少污垢； 而且，HAOPs很容易从膜表面冲洗下来，因此在连续循环中使用似乎是可行的。包括数字。}

This powerpoint presentation begins by presenting the research goal of comparing four adsorbents in terms of their ability to remove natural organic matter (NOM) and reduce membrane fouling, using three different adsorbent dosing approaches. The four adsorbants included: alum, FeCl₃, PAC, and HAOPs. The three different adsorbent dosing approaches included: pre-adsorption, direct filtration, and pre-deposition. Presentation conclusions indicate that: many adsorbents remove NOM, but the ability to reduce membrane fouling depends on the identity of the adsorbent and the dosing approach; at low doses, HAOPs remove NOM (especially high SUVA NOM) more effectively than conventional adsorbents/coagulants; for a given dose of PAC or HAOPs, fouling is less if the adsorbent is deposited on the membrane surface than if it is removed prior to filtration; it appears that pre-deposition of adsorbent is more effective at reducing fouling than adsorption and direct filtration; and, HAOPs are readily washed off membrane surfaces and so seem feasible to use in sequential cycles. Includes figures.