本powerpoint演示的目的是优化曝气和反洗 降低浸没式微滤（SMF）膜污染和能耗的方法 过程实验方法包括:非曝气过滤；定期曝气过滤；连续曝气过滤。介绍了实验材料，并对曝气方法进行了比较。实验结果表明:污垢的程度不同 严重依赖于水质和曝气方法； 夏季主要污染物为颗粒物； 给水浊度小于30 NTU，CAF和PAF均为 有效控制膜污染； NAF的曝气能耗要小得多 而不是咖啡馆；和 这一结果表明，低浊度需要NAF或PAF 给水。然而，这两种药物都不能有效地延缓细胞膜的形成 高浊度给水的污垢。因此，IAF 似乎适用于水量变化较大的给水 因为它们可以减少膜污染 适度的能源消耗。包括表格、数字。

The objective of this powerpoint presentation was to optimize the aeration and backwash methods to minimize membrane fouling and energy consumption for submerged microfiltration (SMF) process. Experimental methods included: non-aeration filtration; periodic aeration filtration; and, continuance aeration filtration. Experimental materials are presented along with comparisons of aeration methods. The experimental results indicate that: the extent of fouling was significantly dependent on water quality and aeration methods; the major foulant was mainly particles in summer; feed water turbidity was less than 30 NTU, CAF and PAF were both effective to control membrane fouling; the energy consumption for aeration was much smaller for NAF than for CAF; and, this result suggests that NAF or PAF is required for low turbidity feed water. However, both were not effective to retard membrane fouling for the case of high turbidity feed water. Accordingly, IAF seems to be useful for feed water with large variations of water quality because they could reduce membrane fouling with moderate energy consumption. Includes tables, figures.