1.1 本测试方法规定了测试防强行进入建筑构件、建筑构件和特种安全设备的要求和测试程序。该测试方法主要用于制造商对其窗户、门、模块化面板、嵌装玻璃和类似产品进行测试和评级，以确保所有制造的产品在遭受主动射击袭击后满足强制进入保护的必要要求。 1.2 该测试方法目前设计用于模拟主动射手，通过重复射击削弱系统，然后进行机械驱动冲击，以模拟强行进入。 1.3 本试验方法不适用于防弹玻璃评级。允许测试射弹穿透整个试样。测试射弹发射旨在模拟攻击者采取的行动，以帮助其进入设施。 1.4 这是在整个系统上进行的实验室测试，因此不适用于现场测试。 1.5 所有测试均在开窗的外表面上进行。 1.6 系统需要在测试框架或现场条件下作为完整单元进行测试。穆勒系统必须在穆勒条件下进行测试。测试结果仅适用于测试的部件或系统。一旦系统经过测试并被视为满足本测试方法的要求，除非符合 附件A1 替代标准。 1.7 部件（如玻璃、门扇等）可根据 附录X1 ，接收组件的能力声明，但不是根据本标准的系统评级。 1.8 门窗系统的额定值应至少达到试验方法的最低水平 F476美元 ， F588英镑 或 功能842 或其组合，视情况而定。本试验不符合上述标准。 1.9 除工具的标称描述符外，本标准中规定的值均为国际单位制。 1.10 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.11 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 本文规定的测试要求用于评估商业、住宅、学校、政府和其他存在单人主动射击袭击风险的机构设施中使用的组件的强行进入阻力特性。 5.2 本试验方法的程序旨在评估创建足够大小的开口以允许试验形状通过的能力。 5.3 本文所述程序以事后检查为基础，不用于确定或确认绝对防止强迫入境。

1.1 This test method sets forth the requirements and testing procedures to test forced-entry-resistant building components, construction components, and specialty security equipment. This test method is intended primarily for manufacturers to test and rate their windows, doors, modular panels, glazings, and similar products to ensure that all manufactured products meet the necessary requirements for forced-entry protection after sustaining an active shooter assault. 1.2 This test method is currently designed to simulate an active shooter weakening the system with repetitive shots followed by mechanically driven impact to simulate forced entry. 1.3 This test method is not to be used for ballistic resistant glazing rating. Test projectiles are permitted to perforate the entire specimen. The test projectile firings are intended to simulate actions taken by an assailant to aid in the ability to gain entry to a facility. 1.4 This is a laboratory test to be performed on full systems and therefore not applicable for field testing. 1.5 All tests are executed on the exterior surface of the fenestration. 1.6 Systems are required to be tested as complete units in a test frame or fielded conditions. Mulled systems must be tested in the mulled condition. Test results only apply to the component or system as tested. Once a system is tested and deemed to satisfy the requirements of this test method, no design change can be made without a retest except those that qualify under Annex A1 Substitution Criteria. 1.7 Components (such as glazing, door leaves, etc.) may be tested in accordance with Appendix X1 , receiving a capability statement for the component, but not a system rating per this standard. 1.8 Window and door systems shall be rated to at least a minimum level of Test Methods F476 , F588 , or F842 , or combinations thereof, as appropriate prior to commencing this test evaluation. This test does not dual certify to the above mentioned standards. 1.9 The values stated in this standard are SI units with the exception of the nominal descriptors for tools. 1.10 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.11 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 The test requirements specified herein have been established for use in evaluating the forced-entry resistance characteristics of assemblies to be used in commercial, residential, schools, government, and other institutional installations where the risk of a single person active shooter attack is present. 5.2 The procedures of this test method are intended to evaluate the ability to create an opening of sufficient size to permit passage of a test shape through it. 5.3 The procedure presented herein is based on post-event examination and are not intended to be used to establish or confirm the absolute prevention of forced entries.