1.1 该分类涵盖了用于对办公设施可用性的一个方面进行分类的匹配量表，即办公设施满足某些可能的性能要求以支持信息技术的典型办公设备的能力。 1.2 在可维护性方面，每一组匹配的标尺，如所示 图。1- 18 ，用于对一个可用性主题进行分类。每个主题通常又分为两个需求功能和供应功能。占用人需求量表中的每个段落（参见 图。1- 18 )总结了居住者可能需要的关于该主题的一个可用性级别。设施评级表中的匹配条目（参见 图。1- 18 )是将要求转化为对设施某些特征的描述，这些特征结合起来表明该设施很可能满足所需的可用性水平。 图1 办公计算机和设备密度需求量表A.5.1 图2 办公计算机和设备密度供应比例A.5.1 图3 可用电力位置需求量表A.5.2.1 图4 配电供电规模A.5.2.1 图5 工作站插件需求量表A.5.2.2 图6 每个工作站的插入点供应比例A.5.2.2 图7 供应可靠性和质量需求量表A.5.3 图8 供应量表A.5.3供应可靠性和质量 图9 水平分布需求量表A.5.4.1 图10 水平分布供应比例A.5.4.1 图11 立管需求量表A.5.4.2 图12 立管供应比例A.5.4.2 图13 入口设施需求量表A.5.4.3 图14 供应规模A。 5.4.3入口设施 图15 现场服务需求量表A.5.4.4 图16 现场服务供应规模A.5.4.4 图17 电缆厂需求量表A.5.5 图18 电缆厂供应规模A.5.5 1.3 设施评级表中的条目（参见 图。1- 18 )只是指示性的，并不全面。它们用于快速扫描，以大致、快速、经济地估计办公设施随着时间的推移可能满足一种或另一种居住群体的需求。这些条目并非用于衡量、了解或评估办公设施的性能。 1.4 该分类可用于评估现有设施的可用性水平。它还可用于评估已规划但尚未建成的设施的可用性，例如- 已经绘制了线路图和外形规格。 1.5 该分类表明了什么会导致设施被评为某一可用性级别，但没有说明如何进行可用性评级，也没有说明如何分配可用性分数。该信息可在实践中找到 1679美元 。本分类中的量表是对《实践》的补充和兼容 1679美元 。每个都需要另一个。 1.6 比例尺旨在确定特定用户特有的各种要求的等级，以及满足这些要求的建筑物的可用性（能力）。因此，比例尺补充而不是包括规范要求。设计师、建筑商和建筑经理仍有责任满足与其在设施设计、施工和持续管理中各自角色相关的适用规范要求。 1.7 以英寸-磅单位表示的数值应视为标准值。括号中给出的数值是国际单位制的数学转换，仅供参考，不被视为标准。 1.8 本标准并不旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前建立适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.9 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 =====意义和用途====== 4.1 每个设施评级表（参见 图。1- 18 )在该分类中，提供了一种方法来估计建筑物或设施的一个可用性主题的可用性水平，并将该水平与任何其他建筑物或设施水平进行比较。 4.2 该分类可用于比较不同建筑物或设施满足特定可用性要求的程度。尽管存在位置、结构、机械系统、年龄和建筑形状等差异，它仍然适用。更多信息可参见ISO 19208 4.3 该分类可用于估计单个办公设施或一组办公设施内的可用性与目标或需求的差异量。 4.4 该分类可用于估计以下内容: 4.4.1 现有设施除当前用途外的可用性。 4.4.2 已规划但尚未建成的设施的可用性（潜力）。 4.4.3 已计划改建的设施的可用性（潜力）。 4.5 使用该分类不会导致建筑物评估或诊断。建筑评估或诊断通常需要在建筑工程或技术以及使用仪器、工具或测量方面的特殊专业知识。 4.6 该分类仅适用于建筑结构或其部分的设施。（虽然该分类可能有助于评估非建筑设施的可用性，但此类设施不在该分类的范围内。 ) 4.7 本分类不适用于监管目的，也不适用于火灾危险评估和火灾风险评估。

1.1 This classification covers matched sets of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office equipment for information technology. 1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each matched set of scales, shown in Figs. 1- 18 , are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each topic is typically broken down into two more demand functions and supply features. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1- 18 ) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 18 ) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Demand Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment FIG. 2 Supply Scale A.5.1 for Density of Office Computers and Equipment FIG. 3 Demand Scale A.5.2.1 for Location of Available Power FIG. 4 Supply Scale A.5.2.1 for Power Distribution FIG. 5 Demand Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points at Workstation FIG. 6 Supply Scale A.5.2.2 for Plug-in Points per Workstation FIG. 7 Demand Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply FIG. 8 Supply Scale A.5.3 for Reliability and Quality of Supply FIG. 9 Demand Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution FIG. 10 Supply Scale A.5.4.1 for Horizontal Distribution FIG. 11 Demand Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers FIG. 12 Supply Scale A.5.4.2 for Risers FIG. 13 Demand Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility FIG. 14 Supply Scale A.5.4.3 for Entrance Facility FIG. 15 Demand Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site FIG. 16 Supply Scale A.5.4.4 for Service to the Site FIG. 17 Demand Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant FIG. 18 Supply Scale A.5.5 for Cable Plant 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 18 ) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. 1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1679 . The scales in this classification are complimentary to, and compatible with, Practice E1679 . Each requires the other. 1.6 The scales are intended to identify the levels of various requirements unique to a particular user, and the serviceability (capability) of a building to meet those requirements. The scales thus supplement rather than include code requirements. It remains the responsibility of designers, builders, and building managers to meet applicable code requirements relative to their respective roles in facility design, construction, and ongoing management. 1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 18 ) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. Further information may be found in ISO 19208. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: 4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use. 4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built. 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned. 4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.