颗粒物（PM）排放会恶化动物设施的室内空气质量，并与人类工作者和动物健康问题有关。可吸入颗粒物的排放还会影响环境空气质量，并引发各种环境问题。需要制定有效的PM缓解措施。对一种优化的静电除尘器（ESP）的设计进行了评估，以确定其对家禽设施中PM2排放物的清洁性能。本研究旨在完成以下工作:（1）确定ESP PM收集的电压和风速的优化设置；（2）量化粉尘浓度、粉尘类型和运行时间对ESP效率的影响；（3）评估ESP在实际家禽设施中的性能。 采用计量送尘器注入的风洞模拟谷仓内的含尘空气。使用实时气溶胶监测器测量PM浓度和粒径计数。使用响应面法对初始ESP性能进行了检查，该方法很好地模拟了电压（9.6至13.6 KV）和空气速度（0.8至2.2 m/s[157至433 ft/min]）对ESP性能的影响（R2=0.8125）。电除尘器的最佳风速为1.7m/s（335ft/min），而最佳电压为13.6kv。电除尘器的性能受粉尘类型的影响很大。高达14 mg/m3（8.7×10–7 lb/ft3）的PM负载对ESP性能没有影响。总ESP收集效率为89%正负7%（实验室）和82%正负6%（现场）。 PM10的效率为86%正负8%（实验室）和84%正负5%（现场），PM2的效率为88%正负8%（实验室）和86%正负5%（现场）。分别为5个。这些结果表明，ESP技术是一种非常有前途的PM缓解方案，可用于禽类排放。引文:ASHRAE交易——第120卷，第一部分，纽约州纽约

Particulate matter (PM) emissions deteriorate the indoor air quality of animal facilities and have been associated with humanworker and animal health problems.PMemissions also affect ambient air quality and cause various environmental issues. Effective PM mitigation measures need to be developed. Anoptimized electrostatic precipitator (ESP) design was evaluated for its cleaning performance forPMemissions from poultry facilities.The study aimed to accomplish the following: (1) determine optimized settings of voltage and air velocity on ESP PM collection, (2) quantify effects of dust concentration, dust type, and operation time on the ESP efficiency, and (3) evaluate the performance of the ESP in an actual poultry facility. A wind tunnel injected by a metered dust feeder was used to simulate dusty air in barns. PM concentrations and size counts were measured using real-time aerosol monitors. Initial ESP performance was examined using response surface methods, which modeled the effect of voltage (9.6 to 13.6 KV) and air velocity (0.8 to 2.2 m/s [157 to 433 ft/min]) on ESP performance very well (R2= 0.8125). The optimized air velocity for the ESP was found to be 1.7 m/s (335 ft/min), while the optimized voltage was 13.6 KV. ESP performance was greatly affected by the type of dust. PM loading of up to 14 mg/m3 (8.7 × 10–7 lb/ft3) had no effect on ESP performance. The total ESP collection efficiency was 89% plus or minus 7% (lab) and 82% plus or minus 6% (field). The efficiency was 86% plus or minus 8% (lab) and 84% plus or minus 5% (field) forPM10 and was88%plus or minus8%(lab) and86%plus or minus5%(field) for PM2.5, respectively. These results showed that ESP technology is a very promising PM mitigation solution for poultryemissions.