This paper describes experiences and new learning from working with end use models to
determine the loss in effectiveness of drought water reduction measures caused by the
implementation of long-term conservation programs. The goal of the paper is to show how modeling water use and customer behavior at the end use
level enables a realistic assessment of just how much cut-backs in demand can be expected and
how those cut-backs are reduced due to the efficiency improvements obtained through long-term
demand reduction programs.
The paper will provide the following types of information, drawn from completed projects:
1. How to model a drought cut-back ordinance as a short-term conservation measure.
2. Which end uses can still be reduced in a drought
3. How short-term and long-term end use reductions interact
4. Typical magnitudes of demand hardening as a function of the amount of long-term
conservation implemented or planned.
5. Realistic expectations for customer cut-backs in droughts in say 2025, after
aggressive long-term conservation programs have been implemented. The Least Cost Planning Demand Management Decision Support System, or DSS model, an end
use cost-benefit tool, has been used for 150 projects over the past nine years. Only recently has
it been used to model demand hardening. Findings to-date are showing that drought ordinances
that call for a 25 percent short-term demand reduction might only achieve 21-22 percent cutbacks
if the plumbing and appliance codes and long-term programs together will save about 15
percent. That is, the demand hardening is only a few percent in this situation. However,
expectations of achieving temporary 35 percent cut-backs, as in the past, are not realistic. The
use of an end use model will reduce the amount of guess work currently required in drought and
supply planning, and reduce one impediment to funding long-term water conservation programs. Includes tables, figures.