首页 馆藏资源 舆情信息 标准服务 科研活动 关于我们
现行 ASTM D7158/D7158M-24a
到馆提醒
收藏跟踪
购买正版
Standard Test Method for Wind Resistance of Asphalt Shingles (Uplift Force/Uplift Resistance Method) 沥青瓦的抗风性的标准试验方法(抗拔力/抗拔力法)
发布日期: 2024-02-01
1.1 本试验方法涵盖了根据制造商的说明使用并在规定条件下密封的沥青瓦的风阻计算程序。依赖联锁或产品刚度来抵御风的Shingle设计不能使用此测试方法进行评估。该方法计算了在特定条件下风作用在木瓦上的扬压力,并将其与木瓦的机械抗拔力进行了比较。在标准条件下,确定木瓦在指定的基本风速下具有防风性(参见 6.3 )当测得的上拔阻力超过该速度的计算上拔力时(3 阵风,ASCE 7)。 1.2 以国际单位制或英寸磅单位表示的数值应单独视为标准。每个系统中规定的值可能不是完全相等的;因此,每个系统应独立使用。将两个系统的值结合起来可能会导致不符合标准。 1.3 本标准并不旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题(如有)。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践,并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.4 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 6.1 密封沥青瓦的风阻与密封瓦抵抗作用于将瓦从下面的瓦上抬起的风力的能力直接相关。该试验方法采用在规定条件下密封后测得的木瓦对机械隆起的阻力进行计算,以确定该阻力是否超过通过木瓦表面的风引起的计算力。 自然风力条件在强度、持续时间和湍流方面有所不同;虽然考虑了这些条件,并使用了指定高于实际负载的假设,但极端的自然变化超出了该测试方法的模拟范围。 6.2 许多因素影响现场木瓦的密封特性;例如,温度、时间、屋顶坡度、污垢和碎屑的污染,以及未对准或驱动不足并干扰密封的紧固件。解决所有这些影响超出了本测试方法的范围。 本试验方法中确定的分类基于试验前在规定条件下密封木瓦代表性样品时确定的机械抗拔性。 6.3 中支持类的计算 4.1 适用于以下所有条件均适用的任何风险类别的建筑物和任何屋顶坡度: 1. ASCE 7-22绘制的基本风速(3 s阵风)不超过第节中与适用木瓦等级相关的风速 4. , 2. 风暴露类别为B或C, 3. 平均屋顶高度不超过60英尺,以及 4. 没有地形风加速效应。 注4: 中类的计算中使用的假设 4.1 满足大多数已安装沥青瓦屋顶的要求。如果这些等级的计算中使用的环境因素不在上述范围内,则需要进行其他计算,以根据项目具体条件确定所需的木瓦等级;提到 附录X1 以获取更多信息和计算示例。咨询木瓦制造商了解具体木瓦的DC

,嗯,我,我 1. ,和L 2. 完成这些计算所需的值。 注5: 需要额外的工程考虑,以验证根据本标准分类的沥青瓦在以下任何一种情况下用于III类和IV类建筑的可接受性:( 1. )ASCE 7-22基本风速超过312公里/小时【194英里/小时】的地理区域,或( 2. )“龙卷风易发区”内的项目现场,并根据ASCE 7-22第32章确定需要龙卷风荷载的设计。 6.4 确定扬升系数的试验是在风速为15的情况下进行的。 6±1.3 m/s[35±3 mph]。本试验程序开发过程中获得的研究数据以及标准风建模实践为其他风速的数据外推提供了依据。为了模拟在高风暴露下的固有特性——凸起的木瓦边缘,根据正在研究的木瓦的风速和抗拔刚度,在木瓦的向风边缘下方适当插入垫片。该试验方法提供了一种测量木瓦隆起刚度的方法,用于确定正确的垫片厚度。 此外,该试验方法允许使用7175 N-mm的抗拔刚度(EI)默认值 2. [2.5磅英寸。 2. ],如果没有进行刚度测量。该默认值是保守的,因为该程序开发过程中测得的最低EI为14 350 N毫米 2. [5.0磅英寸。 2. ]. 注6: 整个风工程领域都是基于在风洞中使用小规模模型,使用的风速远低于全尺寸值。建筑规范允许通过ASCE 7的规定进行此类测试,以取代建筑规范的分析规定- 22.(参见 附录X1 详细信息和参考资料。)
1.1 This test method covers the procedure for calculating the wind resistance of asphalt shingles when applied in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and sealed under defined conditions. Shingle designs that depend on interlocking or product rigidity to resist the wind cannot be evaluated using this test method. The method calculates the uplift force exerted on the shingle by the action of wind at specified conditions, and compares that to the mechanical uplift resistance of the shingle. A shingle is determined to be wind resistant at a specified basic wind speed for standard conditions (see 6.3 ) when the measured uplift resistance exceeds the calculated uplift force for that velocity (3 s gust, ASCE 7). 1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard. 1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 6.1 The wind resistance of sealed asphalt shingles is directly related to the ability of the sealed shingle to resist the force of the wind acting to lift the shingle from the shingle below. This test method employs the measured resistance of the shingle to mechanical uplift after sealing under defined conditions, in a calculation which determines whether this resistance exceeds the calculated force induced by wind passing over the surface of the shingle. Natural wind conditions differ with respect to intensity, duration, and turbulence; while these conditions were considered, and assumptions that specify higher than actual loads are used, extreme natural variations are beyond the means of this test method to simulate. 6.2 Many factors influence the sealing characteristics of shingles in the field; for example, temperature, time, roof slope, contamination by dirt and debris, and fasteners that are misaligned or under driven and interfere with sealing. It is beyond the scope of this test method to address all of these influences. The classification determined in this test method is based on the mechanical uplift resistance determined when representative samples of shingles are sealed under defined conditions before testing. 6.3 The calculations that support the classes in 4.1 apply to buildings of any risk category and any roof slope where all of the following conditions are applicable: (1) The ASCE 7-22 mapped basic wind speed (3 s gust) for a given building risk category does not exceed the wind speed associated with the applicable shingle class in Section 4 , (2) The wind exposure category is B or C, (3) The mean roof height does not exceed 60 ft, and (4) There are no topographic wind speed-up effects. Note 4: The assumptions used in the calculations for the classes in 4.1 cover the requirements for the majority of the asphalt shingle roofs installed. If environmental factors are outside those listed above as used in the calculations for these classes, other calculations are required to determine the required shingle class based on project-specific conditions; refer to Appendix X1 for additional information and calculation examples. Consult the shingle manufacturer for the specific shingle’s DC p , EI, L, L 1 , and L 2 values needed to complete these calculations. Note 5: Additional engineering consideration is necessary to verify acceptability of asphalt shingles classified in accordance with this standard for use on Category III and IV buildings for either of the following conditions: ( 1 ) geographic areas in which the ASCE 7-22 basic wind speed exceeds 312 km/h [194 mph], or ( 2 ) project sites within the “tornado prone region” and determined to require design for tornado loads in accordance with Chapter 32 of ASCE 7-22. 6.4 The test to determine uplift coefficients is conducted with a wind velocity of 15.6 ± 1.3 m/s [35 ± 3 mph]. Research data obtained during the development of this test procedure, as well as standard wind modeling practices, provides for data extrapolation to other wind speeds. In order to simulate the raised shingle edge that is inherent behavior under high wind exposure, shims are inserted under the windward edge of the shingle as appropriate based on wind speed and uplift rigidity of the shingle being investigated. This test method provides a means of measuring shingle uplift rigidity which is used to determine the correct shim thickness. Additionally, this test method allows for the use of a default value for uplift rigidity (EI) of 7175 N-mm 2 [2.5 lbf-in. 2 ], if a rigidity measurement is not made. This default value is conservative since the lowest EI measured in the development of this program was 14 350 N-mm 2 [5.0 lbf-in. 2 ]. Note 6: The entire field of wind engineering is based on use of small-scale models in wind tunnels using wind speeds much lower than the full-scale values. Building Codes permit testing of this type to replace the analytical provisions of the Building Code through the provisions of ASCE 7-22. (See Appendix X1 for details and references.)
分类信息
关联关系
研制信息
归口单位: D08.02
相似标准/计划/法规