1.1 该分类涵盖了对办公设施可服务性的一个方面进行分类的两个尺度，即办公设施满足某些可能要求的能力，以适应工作方法的变化、员工的频繁调动和工作站的重新调整。 1.2 每对天平如所示 无花果。1- 5. ，并排打印在一页上，用于在可用性方面对一个可用性主题进行分类。乘员需求量表中的每个段落（参见 无花果。1- 5. )总结了乘员可能需要的该主题的一个可用性级别。设施评级量表（见）中的匹配条目是将要求转换为设施某些特征的描述，这些特征结合在一起，表明该设施可能满足所需的可用性水平。 图1 A.6.1级物理变化引起的中断 图1 A.6.1级物理变化引起的中断 （续） 图2 照明、HVAC和喷水装置的比例A.6.2 图2 照明、HVAC和喷水装置的比例A.6.2 （续） 图3 比例A.6.3，用于布局的微小变化 图3 比例A.6.3，用于布局的微小变化 （续） 图4 隔墙重新定位的比例A.6.4 图4 隔墙重新定位的比例A.6.4 （续） 图5 设施组交付周期的比例A.6.5 图5 设施组交付周期的比例A.6.5 （续） 1.3 设施评级表中的条目（参见 无花果。1- 5. )仅供参考，但不全面。它们用于快速扫描，以大致、快速和经济地估计办公设施随着时间的推移可能满足一种或另一种类型居住群体的需求的程度。这些条目不是为了衡量、了解和评估办公设施的表现。 1.4 该分类可用于评估现有设施的可用性水平。它还可用于估计已规划但尚未建造的设施的可用性，例如已编制单线图和轮廓规范的设施。 1.5 该分类指出了导致设施被评为某一可用性水平的因素，但没有说明如何进行可用性评级或如何分配可用性分数。在实践中可以找到这些信息 E1334 . 该分类中的量表是对实践的补充和兼容 E1334 . 每一个都需要另一个。 1.6 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 4.1 本分类中的每个设施等级表提供了一种方法，用于估计建筑物或设施的一个可用性主题的可用性水平，并将该水平与任何其他建筑物或设施的水平进行比较。 4.2 该分类可用于比较不同建筑物或设施满足特定可用性要求的程度。尽管存在位置、结构、机械系统、年龄和建筑形状等差异，但它仍然适用。 4.3 该分类可用于估计单个办公设施或一组办公设施的目标或需求的可用性差异量。 4.4 该分类可用于估计以下各项:( 1. )现有设施的可用性，不包括其当前用途；( 2. )已规划但尚未建造的设施的可用性（潜力）；和( 3. )计划改建的设施的可用性（潜力）。 4.5 使用该分类不会导致建筑物评估或诊断。建筑评估或诊断通常需要建筑工程或技术方面的专业知识，以及仪器、工具或测量的使用。 4.6 该分类仅适用于属于建筑结构或其部分的设施。 （虽然该分类可能有助于评估非建筑设施的可用性，但此类设施不在该分类的范围内。） 4.7 该分类不适用于监管目的，也不适用于火灾危险评估或火灾风险评估。

1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements to accommodate changes in working method, and frequent relocations of staff, and realignment of workstations. 1.2 Each pair of scales shown in Figs. 1- 5 , printed side by side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1- 5 ) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Scale A.6.1 for Disruption Due to Physical Change FIG. 1 Scale A.6.1 for Disruption Due to Physical Change (continued) FIG. 2 Scale A.6.2 for Illumination, HVAC, and Sprinklers FIG. 2 Scale A.6.2 for Illumination, HVAC, and Sprinklers (continued) FIG. 3 Scale A.6.3 for Minor Changes to Layout FIG. 3 Scale A.6.3 for Minor Changes to Layout (continued) FIG. 4 Scale A.6.4 for Partition Wall Relocations FIG. 4 Scale A.6.4 for Partition Wall Relocations (continued) FIG. 5 Scale A.6.5 for Lead Time for Facilities Group FIG. 5 Scale A.6.5 for Lead Time for Facilities Group (continued) 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 5 ) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. 1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but it does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating or how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334 . The scales in this classification are complementary to and compatible with Practice E1334 . Each requires the other. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement for a single office facility or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: ( 1 ) the serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; ( 2 ) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and ( 3 ) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned. 4.5 The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment or fire risk assessment.