1.1 本试验方法涵盖了评估碾压侵蚀控制产品（RECP）保护土槽免受雨水侵蚀能力的指南、要求和程序。这种保护的关键要素是RECP能够: 1.1.1 中和和吸收雨水的水力，从而通过“冲刷”机制减少土壤颗粒松动； 1.1.2 减缓径流并促进沉淀，从而减少土壤颗粒向下游的输送； 1.1.3 吸收陆上水流的剪切力； 1.1.4 将土壤颗粒截留在下方；和 1.1.5 促进植被的建立。 1.2 该测试方法采用全尺寸测试程序，而不是缩小规模（台架规模）模拟，并根据重建工作前后建筑工地上通常发现的条件进行建模。此外，还提供了基线条件评估程序。 因此，本文中的测试准备、测试执行、数据收集、数据分析和报告程序适用于裸土、未植被RECP、植被土壤和植被RECP条件的测试。 1.3 该试验方法在受控和记录的条件下，对未植被的RECP与基线裸土条件以及植被的RECP与基线植被条件进行了比较评估。 1.4 以国际单位制表示的数值应视为标准。括号中给出的英寸磅单位仅供参考。 1.5 本标准并不旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 此外，用户在使用测试方法时，必须遵守普遍的监管规范，如OSHA（职业健康与安全管理局）指南。 1.6 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 此测试方法评估RECP及其安装方式，以: 5.1.1 在不同渠道条件和土壤类型的条件下，减少雨水径流中的土壤损失和沉积物浓度； 5.1.2 在复合系统中起植物加固作用的功能；和 5.1.3 通过最大限度地减少进场，改善受土方工程活动干扰区域的水质- 河床内的原位颗粒。 5.2 该试验方法对涉及土方工程活动的施工现场的典型情况进行建模和检查，包括:公路和道路；机场；住宅、商业和工业发展；管道、矿山和垃圾填埋场；高尔夫球场；等 5.3 此测试方法是一种性能测试，但可用于质量控制，以确定产品是否符合项目规范。由于有关实验室特定精度的信息不完整，因此建议谨慎。对于特定项目的一致性，应考虑独特的特定项目条件。

1.1 This test method covers the guidelines, requirements and procedures for evaluating the ability of Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECPs) to protect earthen channels from stormwater-induced erosion. Critical elements of this protection are the ability of the RECP to: 1.1.1 Neutralize and absorb the hydraulic force of stormwater, thereby reducing soil particle loosening through “scour” mechanisms; 1.1.2 Slow runoff and encourage sedimentation, thereby reducing soil particle transport downstream; 1.1.3 Absorb shear forces of overland flow; 1.1.4 Trap soil particles beneath; and 1.1.5 Promote the establishment of vegetation. 1.2 This test method utilizes full-scale testing procedures, rather than reduced-scale (bench-scale) simulation, and is patterned after conditions typically found on construction sites prior to and after revegetation work. Further, procedures for evaluation of baseline conditions are provided. Thus, test preparation, test execution, data collection, data analysis and reporting procedures herein are intended to be suitable for testing of bare soil, unvegetated RECP, vegetated soil and vegetated RECP conditions. 1.3 This test method provides a comparative evaluation of an unvegetated RECP to baseline bare soil conditions and a vegetated RECP to a baseline, vegetated condition under controlled and documented conditions. 1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The inch-pound units given in parentheses are provided for information purposes only. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Also, the user must comply with prevalent regulatory codes, such as OSHA (Occupational Health and Safety Administration) guidelines, while using the test method. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 This test method evaluates RECPs and their means of installation to: 5.1.1 Reduce soil loss and sediment concentrations in stormwater runoff under conditions of varying channel conditions and soil type; 5.1.2 Function within a composite system acting as vegetative reinforcement; and 5.1.3 Improve water quality exiting the area disturbed by earthwork activity by minimizing mobilization of in-situ particles within the streambed. 5.2 This test method models and examines conditions typically found on construction sites involving earthwork activities, including: highways and roads; airports; residential, commercial and industrial developments; pipelines, mines, and landfills; golf courses; etc. 5.3 This test method is a performance test, but can be used for quality control to determine product conformance to project specifications. Caution is advised since information regarding laboratory specific precision is incomplete. For project specific conformance, unique project-specific conditions should be taken into consideration.