首页 馆藏资源 舆情信息 标准服务 科研活动 关于我们
现行 AWWA MTC69790
到馆提醒
收藏跟踪
购买正版
Performance and Cost Effectiveness of Reverse Osmosis and Electrodialysis Reversal for Desalination of Brackish Groundwater Containing High Silica 反渗透和电渗析反渗透用于含高硅微咸水淡化的性能和成本效益
发布日期: 2009-11-01
微咸水淡化是我国发展饮用水资源的重要途径 缺水的干旱地区。电渗析反渗透(EDR)和反渗透(RO)都是 适用于微咸水淡化的技术。进行了反渗透试验 来自圣帕斯夸尔水盆(加利福尼亚州圣迭戈)的地下水含有1300 mg/L TDS和60 mg/L的二氧化硅证明,反渗透工艺可以在10 gfd的温度下运行 回收率为75%,总溶解固体(TDS)截留率为96%,预计清洗频率为2个月。 这个 EDR过程的性能,通过使用WATSYS软件对 相同的水化学表明,该工艺可在88%的回收率下运行 TDS排斥率为78%。编制了数量级成本估算(-30%和+50%) 对于反渗透和EDR处理相同物料的三种不同进料流量方案(3、5、8 MGD) 地下水表明,这两种工艺的成本相当。然而,相关的成本 本次成本估算未考虑精矿处理。包括9个参考文献、表格、图表。
Brackish water desalination is an important alternative for developing drinking water sources in water-scarce arid regions. Both electrodialysis reversal (EDR) and reverse osmosis (RO) are suitable technologies for desalination of brackish groundwater. The RO pilot testing, conducted with the groundwater from San Pasqual water basin (San Diego, California), containing 1300 mg/L of TDS and 60 mg/L of silica, demonstrated that the RO process could be operated at 10 gfd with 75% recovery and 96% total dissolved solids (TDS) rejection with an estimated cleaning frequency of 2 months. The performance of the EDR process, predicted from the modeling using WATSYS software for the same water chemistry, indicated that this process could be operated at 88% recovery with the TDS rejection of 78%. The order of magnitude cost estimates (-30% and +50%) were prepared for three different feed flow scenarios (3, 5, 8 MGD) for RO and EDR treating the same groundwater suggested that both processes were cost comparable. However, the costs associated with the concentrate disposal were not considered in this cost estimation. Includes 9 references, tables, figures.
分类信息
发布单位或类别: 美国-美国给水工程协会
关联关系
研制信息
相似标准/计划/法规