1.1 这些测试方法涵盖了各种类型的窗户组件抑制、延迟或阻止强行进入的能力。 1.2 对于这些测试方法，窗口组件的定义如中所述 1.2.1 – 1.2.5 如中所示 图1 具有可操作窗扇和固定窗格组合的窗户组件应分别进行分类和测试。 图1 典型窗户类型（从外部看） 1.2.1 A类- 一种窗户组件，包括一个或多个可通过 滑行的 在墙的平面内垂直地或水平地。 1.2.2 B类- 包含一个或多个窗框的窗户组件 铰接的 在窗扇的两个角处或附近，并且朝向外部（向外摆动）或朝向内部（向内摆动）开口。 1.2.3 C类- 包含一个或多个窗框的窗户组件 枢轴转动的 使得窗扇的一部分朝着内部开口，并且其一部分朝外部开口。 1.2.4 D型- 一种车窗总成，包括一个或多个 固定的 设计为不打开的窗格（玻璃）或固定窗扇。 1.2.5 E型- 一种窗户组件，包括一系列重叠的水平百叶窗，这些百叶窗由一个公共致动器同时枢转，以便在操作过程中每个百叶窗的底边向外摆动，顶边向内摆动。 注1: 看见 图1 用于窗口组件类型的图形描述。 1.3 以英寸磅为单位的数值应视为标准。括号中给出的值是国际单位制的数学转换，仅供参考，不被视为标准。 1.4 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管要求的适用性。 1.5 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认的标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 5.1 这些测试方法旨在为遭受非熟练或机会性窃贼袭击（而非撞击玻璃材料）的窗户组件确定抵抗力。 抵抗熟练的入室盗窃攻击所产生的更高水平的力量需要警报、通信或逮捕系统等方法，或比这些测试方法评估的更复杂的特殊安全玻璃材料。执行测试的技术人员应了解该测试方法的意图，并应接受执行和通过/失败标准方面的培训。 5.2 通过窗户组件进入可以通过撞击玻璃材料来实现。该方法不评估玻璃材料的破损情况。必须使用其他标准来评估撞击玻璃的强行进入。 5.3 绩效水平的验收标准由具有特定管辖权的主管部门制定。建议的指导方针见 附件A1 .

1.1 These test methods cover the ability of window assemblies of various types to restrain, delay, or frustrate forced entry. 1.2 For purposes of these test methods, window assemblies are defined as described in 1.2.1 – 1.2.5 and as shown in Fig. 1 . Window assemblies with a combination of operable sash and fixed panes (lites) shall be classified and tested separately for each type. FIG. 1 Typical Window Types (viewed from the exterior) 1.2.1 Type A— A window assembly which incorporates one or more sash that open by sliding , either vertically or horizontally within the plane of the wall. 1.2.2 Type B— A window assembly which incorporates one or more sash that are hinged at or near two corners of the sash and that open toward the exterior (outswinging) or toward the interior (inswinging). 1.2.3 Type C— A window assembly which incorporates one or more sash that are pivoted so that part of the sash opens toward the interior and part of it opens toward the exterior. 1.2.4 Type D— A window assembly which incorporates one or more fixed panes (lites) or stationary sash that are designed not to open. 1.2.5 Type E— A window assembly which incorporates a series of overlapping horizontal louvers that are pivoted simultaneously by a common actuator so that the bottom edge of each louver swings outward and the top edge swings inward during operation. Note 1: See Fig. 1 for graphic depiction of window assembly types. 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 5.1 These test methods are intended to establish a measure of resistance for window assemblies subjected to attacks (other than impacting glazing materials) by unskilled or opportunistic burglars. Resistance to higher levels of force generated by skilled burglary attack requires methods such as alarms, communication, or apprehension systems, or special security glazing materials more sophisticated than those evaluated by these test methods. Technicians performing the test should understand the intent of this test method and should be trained on the execution and pass/fail criteria. 5.2 Entry through a window assembly can be accomplished by impacting the glazing materials. This method does not evaluate glazing materials for breakage. Other standards must be used to evaluate forced entry by impacting the glazing. 5.3 Acceptance criteria for performance levels are a matter for authorities having specific jurisdiction to establish. Suggested guidelines are found in Annex A1 .