1.1 该分类涵盖了用于对办公设施可用性的一个方面进行分类的成对尺度，即办公设施满足适当声音和视觉条件的某些可能要求的能力。 1.2 在可维护性方面，每对天平，如 无花果。1- 6. ，用于对一个可用性主题进行分类。乘员需求量表中的每个段落（参见 无花果。1- 6. )总结了乘员可能需要的该主题的一个可用性级别。设施评级表中的匹配条目（参见 无花果。 1- 6. )是将要求转化为设施某些特征的描述，结合起来，表明设施可能满足所需的可用性水平。 图1 隐私和语音可懂度等级A.3.1 图1 隐私和语音可懂度等级A.3.1 （续） 图2 分心和干扰量表A.3.2 图2 分心和干扰量表A.3.2 （续） 图3 振动标度A.3.3 图4 照明和眩光比例A.3.4 图4 照明和眩光比例A.3.4 （续） 图。 5. 比例A.3.5用于调节居住者的照明 图5 比例A.3.5用于调节居住者的照明 （续） 图6 远视和外视比例A.3.6 1.3 设施评级表中的条目（参见 无花果。1- 6. )仅供参考，但不全面。它们用于快速扫描，以大致、快速和经济地估计办公设施随着时间的推移可能满足一种或另一种类型居住群体的需求的程度。这些条目不是为了衡量、了解或评估办公设施的表现。 1.4 该分类可用于估计现有设施的可用性水平。 它还可用于估计已规划但尚未建造的设施的可用性，例如已编制单线图和轮廓规范的设施。 1.5 该分类表明了什么会导致设施被评为某一可用性水平，但没有说明如何进行可用性评级，也没有说明如何分配可用性分数。在实践中可以找到这些信息 E1334 . 该分类中的量表是对实践的补充和兼容 E1334 . 每一个都需要另一个。 1.6 以国际单位制表示的数值应视为标准值。 本标准不包括其他计量单位。 1.7 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 4.1 每个设施评级表（见 无花果。1- 6. )在该分类中，提供了一种方法来估计建筑物或设施对一个可用性主题的可用性水平，并将该水平与任何其他建筑物或设施的水平进行比较。 4.2 该分类可用于比较不同建筑物或设施满足特定可用性要求的程度。尽管存在位置、结构、机械系统、年龄和建筑形状等差异，但它仍然适用。 4.3 该分类可用于估计单个办公设施或一组办公设施内的可用性与目标或需求的差异量。 4.4 该分类可用于估计以下各项: 4.4.1 现有设施对其当前用途以外的用途的可用性。 4.4.2 已规划但尚未建造的设施的可用性（潜力）。 4.4.3 计划改建的设施的可用性（潜力）。 4.5 使用该分类不会导致建筑物评估或诊断。建筑评估或诊断通常需要建筑工程或技术方面的专业知识，以及仪器、工具或测量的使用。 4.6 该分类仅适用于建筑结构或其部分的设施。（虽然该分类可能有助于评估非建筑设施的可用性，但此类设施不在本分类范围内。 ) 4.7 该分类不适用于监管目的，也不适用于火灾危险评估或火灾风险评估。

1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for suitable sound and visual conditions. 1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1- 6 , are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1- 6 ) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 6 ) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability. FIG. 1 Scale A.3.1 for Privacy and Speech Intelligibility FIG. 1 Scale A.3.1 for Privacy and Speech Intelligibility (continued) FIG. 2 Scale A.3.2 for Distraction and Disturbance FIG. 2 Scale A.3.2 for Distraction and Disturbance (continued) FIG. 3 Scale A.3.3 for Vibration FIG. 4 Scale A.3.4 for Lighting and Glare FIG. 4 Scale A.3.4 for Lighting and Glare (continued) FIG. 5 Scale A.3.5 for Adjustment of Lighting by Occupants FIG. 5 Scale A.3.5 for Adjustment of Lighting by Occupants (continued) FIG. 6 Scale A.3.6 for Distant and Outside Views 1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 6 ) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing. 1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared. 1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334 . The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334 . Each requires the other. 1.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 4.1 Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1- 6 ) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility. 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape. 4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities. 4.4 This classification can be used to estimate the following: 4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use. 4.4.2 Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built. 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned. 4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology, and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.) 4.7 This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.