1.1 本规程适用于加拿大机动游戏机和设备的术语、设计、制造、操作、维护和检查。 1.2 本规程采用ASTM委员会F24标准，列在第节中 2.2 , 2.3 和 2.4 . 1.3 本规程包括一个附件（强制性），该附件提供了与本规程中所述标准的应用相关的附加信息（例如，原理、背景、解释、图纸、注释等）。 1.4 本规程包括一个附录（非强制性），该附录提供了额外信息（例如，原理、背景、解释、图纸、注释等），以提高用户对本规程中所述标准的理解和应用。 1.5 本规程和其他ASTM标准的用户有责任判断其是否适合特定用途。 1.6 该实践包括以下部分: 标题 部分 范围 1. 参考文件 2. ASTM委员会F24核心标准 用于游乐设施和设备 2.2 ASTM委员会F24支持标准 用于游乐设施和设备 2.3 ASTM委员会F24标准 机动游戏机的具体分类 和设备 2.4 其他标准 2.5 参考规范、标准、规范， 和手册 2.6 术语 3. 意义和用途 4. 设计 5. 全体的 5.1 替换中的参考文件 实践 F2291 带备用文件 5.2 全体的 5.2.1 加拿大标准 5.2.2 实践中的例外情况 F2291 5.3 其他要求 5.4 制造 6. 所有权、操作、维护和检查 7. 实践中的例外情况 F770 7.3 其他要求 7.4 机动游戏机和设备的审计 8. 认可的认证标志 附件A1 意义和用途 附录X1 乘客座椅和约束垫的硬度测量 附录X2 1.7 有关ASTM标准中使用的术语表，包括应、应、可、将、标准、惯例、指南、分类、规范等词的含义和意图，请参阅www.ASTM.com上的“ASTM标准的形式和风格”。组织。 1.8 本标准并非旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题（如有）。本标准的用户有责任在使用前制定适当的安全、健康和环境实践，并确定监管限制的适用性。 1.9 本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒（TBT）委员会发布的《关于制定国际标准、指南和建议的原则的决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。 ====意义和用途====== 4.1 本规程的目的是采用ASTM F24委员会关于加拿大使用的游乐设施和设备的标准。 4.2 本实践为加拿大使用其他规范和标准提供了指导。 4.3 如果本惯例与当地规范之间存在冲突，则以当地规范为准。

1.1 This practice applies to the terminology, design, manufacture, operation, maintenance, and inspection of amusement rides and devices in Canada. 1.2 This practice adopts ASTM Committee F24 Standards listed under Sections 2.2 , 2.3 and 2.4 . 1.3 This practice includes an annex (mandatory), which provides additional information (for example, rationale, background, interpretations, drawings, commentary, etc.) related to the application of the criteria presented in this practice. 1.4 This practice includes an appendix (non-mandatory), which provides additional information (for example, rationale, background, interpretations, drawings, commentary, and so forth) to improve the user’s understanding and application of the criteria presented in this practice. 1.5 It is the responsibility of the users of this practice and other ASTM Standards to judge their suitability for a particular purpose. 1.6 This practice includes the following sections: Title Section Scope 1 Referenced Documents 2 ASTM Committee F24 Core Standards for Amusement Rides and Devices 2.2 ASTM Committee F24 Supporting Standards for Amusement Rides and Devices 2.3 ASTM Committee F24 Standards for Specific Classification of Amusement Rides and Devices 2.4 Other Standards 2.5 Reference Codes, Standards, Specifications, and Handbooks 2.6 Terminology 3 Significance and Use 4 Design 5 General 5.1 Substitution of Referenced Documents in Practice F2291 with Alternate Documents 5.2 General 5.2.1 Canadian Standards 5.2.2 Exceptions from Practice F2291 5.3 Additional Requirements 5.4 Manufacture 6 Ownership, Operation, Maintenance, and Inspection 7 Exceptions from Practice F770 7.3 Additional Requirements 7.4 Auditing of Amusement Rides and Devices 8 Recognized Certification Marks Annex A1 Significance and Use Appendix X1 Hardness Measurement of Patron Seat and Restraint Padding Appendix X2 1.7 For a glossary of terms that includes the meaning and intent of words such as shall, should, may, will, standard, practice, guide, classification, specification, etc. used in ASTM standards, please refer to “Form and Style for ASTM Standards,” which is available at www.astm.org. 1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.9 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. ====== Significance And Use ====== 4.1 The purpose of this practice is to adopt the ASTM F24 Committee Standards for Amusement Rides and Devices for use in Canada. 4.2 This practice provides guidance for use of additional codes and standards in Canada. 4.3 In cases where conflicts exist between this practice and local codes, local codes would prevail.